PCEWX vs. MIFIX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PCEWX (PIMCO Climate Bond Fund) and MIFIX (Miller Intermediate Bond Fund) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PCEWX returned 0.67%/yr vs 3.81%/yr for MIFIX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCEWX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MIFIX.

Performance

PCEWX vs. MIFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Climate Bond Fund (PCEWX) and Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCEWX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than MIFIX's 5.15% return.

PCEWX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: -0.51%
• 1Y: 2.95%
• 3Y*: 4.97%
• 5Y*: 0.67%
• 10Y*: —

MIFIX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 5.15%
• 6M: 5.37%
• 1Y: 10.58%
• 3Y*: 8.32%
• 5Y*: 3.81%
• 10Y*: 5.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCEWX vs. MIFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PCEWX PIMCO Climate Bond Fund	0.19%	5.87%	3.47%	8.17%	-13.18%	0.11%	6.61%	0.00%
MIFIX Miller Intermediate Bond Fund	5.15%	7.11%	7.31%	6.88%	-7.72%	4.32%	14.22%	0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PCEWX and MIFIX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2019	0.24

The correlation between PCEWX and MIFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCEWX vs. MIFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCEWX

PCEWX Risk / Return Rank: 10
PCEWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
PCEWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
PCEWX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
PCEWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
PCEWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

MIFIX

MIFIX Risk / Return Rank: 91
MIFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
MIFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MIFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
MIFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
MIFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCEWX vs. MIFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Climate Bond Fund (PCEWX) and Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCEWX	MIFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	3.45	-2.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	5.61	-4.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.71	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	3.91	-3.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.44	15.72	-13.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCEWX vs. MIFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCEWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the MIFIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCEWX and MIFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCEWX	MIFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	3.45	-2.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.76	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.96	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.99	-0.66

Drawdowns

PCEWX vs. MIFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCEWX drawdown since its inception was -17.54%, which is greater than MIFIX's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEWX and MIFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCEWX	MIFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.54%	-15.58%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.39%	-2.68%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.39%	-5.39%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.54%	-11.87%	-5.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-15.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-0.23%	-1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-2.06%	-2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	0.67%	+0.45%

Volatility

PCEWX vs. MIFIX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Climate Bond Fund (PCEWX) and Miller Intermediate Bond Fund (MIFIX) have volatilities of 1.21% and 1.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCEWX	MIFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.21%	1.21%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.72%	2.21%	+0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.38%	3.04%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.36%	5.01%	-0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.49%	5.41%	-0.92%

PCEWX vs. MIFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCEWX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than MIFIX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCEWX vs. MIFIX - Dividend Comparison

PCEWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than MIFIX's 3.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MIFIX Miller Intermediate Bond Fund	3.97%	4.59%	4.08%	3.60%	3.62%	5.87%	5.16%	2.36%	5.16%	3.90%	1.48%	1.78%
PCEWX PIMCO Climate Bond Fund	3.28%	3.34%	3.52%	2.53%	5.55%	2.56%	2.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCEWX and MIFIX in my portfolio?

PCEWX and MIFIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCEWX or MIFIX?

MIFIX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to PCEWX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCEWX dropped -17.54% vs MIFIX's -15.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MIFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.