PCEMX vs. GLLSX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX).

PCEMX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 23, 1995. GLLSX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2000.

Performance

PCEMX vs. GLLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PCEMX vs. GLLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments	0.24%	36.75%	4.15%	10.33%	-18.97%	-1.79%	20.13%	19.01%	-16.42%	34.14%
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	5.47%	34.81%	0.73%	21.35%	-23.04%	36.50%	15.93%	23.64%	-11.50%	23.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCEMX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than GLLSX's 5.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PCEMX has underperformed GLLSX with an annualized return of 7.49%, while GLLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.57% annualized return.

PCEMX

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -14.42%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 4.50%
• 1Y: 32.08%
• 3Y*: 14.19%
• 5Y*: 3.97%
• 10Y*: 7.49%

GLLSX

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -13.34%
• YTD: 5.47%
• 6M: 15.81%
• 1Y: 48.29%
• 3Y*: 17.69%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: 11.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCEMX vs. GLLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCEMX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GLLSX's 1.23% expense ratio.

GLLSX

abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund

PCEMX

PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments

Return for Risk

PCEMX vs. GLLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCEMX

PCEMX Risk / Return Rank: 87
PCEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PCEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PCEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PCEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PCEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

GLLSX

GLLSX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GLLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GLLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GLLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GLLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GLLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCEMX vs. GLLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) and abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCEMX	GLLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.46	-0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	3.02	-0.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.46	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	3.15	-0.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.95	13.47	-4.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCEMX vs. GLLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the GLLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCEMX and GLLSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCEMX	GLLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	2.46	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.71	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.67	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.55	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between PCEMX and GLLSX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PCEMX vs. GLLSX - Dividend Comparison

PCEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than GLLSX's 1.78% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCEMX PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments	4.89%	4.91%	1.22%	1.44%	2.52%	11.70%	1.10%	1.04%	1.84%	1.16%	1.09%	1.09%
GLLSX abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund	1.78%	1.88%	0.74%	0.77%	29.32%	22.85%	0.00%	3.38%	9.47%	8.40%	1.09%	0.94%

Drawdowns

PCEMX vs. GLLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCEMX drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than GLLSX's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEMX and GLLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCEMX	GLLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.32%	-32.59%	-32.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.42%	-14.39%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.66%	-30.02%	-6.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.17%	-32.59%	-6.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.42%	-14.39%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.98%	-7.99%	-12.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	3.36%	+0.46%

Volatility

PCEMX vs. GLLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE International Emerging Markets Equity Investments (PCEMX) is 8.92%, while abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (GLLSX) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that PCEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCEMX	GLLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.92%	10.78%	-1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.34%	15.60%	-2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.15%	19.51%	-1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	17.21%	-0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.29%	17.34%	-0.05%