PCEF vs. MDAA

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

PCEF (Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. PCEF is passively managed, while MDAA is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCEF charges 2.71%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.

Performance

PCEF vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCEF achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 16.65% return.

PCEF

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.72%
• 6M: 4.89%
• YTD: 6.32%
• 1Y: 11.68%
• 3Y*: 12.92%
• 5Y*: 4.94%
• 10Y*: 7.20%

MDAA

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -0.84%
• 6M: 11.34%
• YTD: 16.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCEF vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF	6.32%	0.89%
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	16.65%	-0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PCEF and MDAA is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025	0.78

Return for Risk

PCEF vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCEF

PCEF Risk / Return Rank: 44
PCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 49

MDAA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCEF vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCEF	MDAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.50	—	—

Drawdowns

PCEF vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCEF drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEF and MDAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCEF	MDAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.64%	-14.59%	-24.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-5.55%	+5.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.45%	-3.24%	-1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCEF	MDAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.00%	24.81%	-15.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.55%	24.81%	-13.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.30%	24.81%	-11.51%

PCEF vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCEF has a 2.71% expense ratio, which is higher than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCEF vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison

PCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, more than MDAA's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	0.39%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF	7.62%	7.96%	8.79%	9.86%	8.93%	6.67%	7.54%	7.12%	8.21%	6.96%	7.72%	9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCEF and MDAA in my portfolio?

PCEF and MDAA have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCEF or MDAA?

On fees, MDAA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCEF or MDAA?

MDAA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 2.71% for PCEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCEF or MDAA?

PCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.62%, compared with 0.39% for MDAA.

What is the main difference between PCEF and MDAA?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 2.71% for PCEF and 0.97% for MDAA.