PCEF vs. EAOR
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR).
PCEF and EAOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PCEF is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index. It was launched on Feb 19, 2010. EAOR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2020. Both PCEF and EAOR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PCEF vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCEF vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | -3.43% | 12.59% | 16.70% | 9.39% | -18.66% | 15.38% | 16.99% |
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | -1.51% | 15.59% | 10.69% | 14.96% | -16.66% | 10.51% | 15.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCEF achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly lower than EAOR's -1.51% return.
PCEF
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -1.94%
- 1Y
- 8.22%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
EAOR
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- YTD
- -1.51%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.30%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCEF vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCEF has a 2.71% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOR's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCEF vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank
PCEF
EAOR
PCEF vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCEF | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.27 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 1.85 | -0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.27 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 1.81 | -1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 8.06 | -4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCEF | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.27 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.51 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.74 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCEF and EAOR is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PCEF vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison
PCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%, more than EAOR's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 8.32% | 7.96% | 8.79% | 9.86% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 7.54% | 7.12% | 8.21% | 6.96% | 7.72% | 9.18% |
EAOR iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 1.99% | 1.39% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PCEF vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCEF drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, which is greater than EAOR's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEF and EAOR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCEF | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.64% | -22.91% | -15.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.94% | -7.80% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.25% | -22.91% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.00% | -4.80% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.51% | -5.18% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 1.75% | +0.55% |
Volatility
PCEF vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) at 4.28%. This indicates that PCEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCEF | EAOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 4.28% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.05% | 6.59% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 11.09% | +2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.42% | 10.46% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 10.41% | +2.84% |