PCEF vs. AFIF
PCEF (Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF) and AFIF (Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCEF is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index, while AFIF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds. PCEF is passively managed, while AFIF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PCEF returned 4.82%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for AFIF. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCEF charges 2.71%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for AFIF.
Performance
PCEF vs. AFIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCEF achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly higher than AFIF's 1.38% return.
PCEF
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
AFIF
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- —
PCEF vs. AFIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 4.88% | 12.59% | 16.70% | 9.39% | -18.66% | 15.38% | 4.61% | 24.08% | -9.61% |
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 1.38% | 6.56% | 7.06% | 9.73% | -5.38% | -0.50% | 2.14% | 0.41% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCEF and AFIF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2018 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, PCEF and AFIF have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
PCEF vs. AFIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PCEF
AFIF
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
PCEF
AFIF
-
Technology
PCEF
AFIF
-
Communication Services
PCEF
AFIF
-
Healthcare
PCEF
AFIF
-
Industrials
PCEF
AFIF
-
Consumer Cyclical
PCEF
AFIF
-
Energy
PCEF
AFIF
Utilities
PCEF
AFIF
-
Consumer Defensive
PCEF
AFIF
-
Basic Materials
PCEF
AFIF
-
Real Estate
PCEF
AFIF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCEF vs. AFIF — Risk / Return Rank
PCEF
AFIF
PCEF vs. AFIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCEF | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 3.22 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 14.16 | -6.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCEF | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.90 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.80 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.42 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
PCEF vs. AFIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCEF drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, which is greater than AFIF's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEF and AFIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCEF | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.64% | -10.29% | -28.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -1.63% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.09% | -1.79% | -12.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.25% | -8.85% | -15.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.11% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -2.23% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 0.37% | +1.40% |
Volatility
PCEF vs. AFIF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) at 0.61%. This indicates that PCEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCEF | AFIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 0.61% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.30% | 2.03% | +5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.61% | 2.76% | +5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.48% | 4.44% | +7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 6.27% | +7.02% |
PCEF vs. AFIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCEF has a 2.71% expense ratio, which is higher than AFIF's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCEF vs. AFIF - Dividend Comparison
PCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than AFIF's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 3.58% | 3.52% | 5.61% | 5.91% | 3.49% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 2.54% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 7.73% | 7.96% | 8.79% | 9.86% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 7.54% | 7.12% | 8.21% | 6.96% | 7.72% | 9.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCEF and AFIF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCEF has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to AFIF (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCEF dropped -38.64% vs AFIF's -10.29%.
On 5-year performance, PCEF leads with 4.82% vs 3.54% for AFIF. On fees, AFIF is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, AFIF has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PCEF has performed better with a 4.82% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AFIF is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 2.71% for PCEF.
PCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.73%, compared with 3.58% for AFIF.
PCEF is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while AFIF is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Regents Park Funds. Their fees differ too: 2.71% for PCEF and 1.08% for AFIF.
AFIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCEF and AFIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer