PCDLX vs. JLKYX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PCDLX (Putnam Retirement Advantage 2035 Fund) and JLKYX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, PCDLX returned 8.31%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for JLKYX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PCDLX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for JLKYX.

Performance

PCDLX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Retirement Advantage 2035 Fund (PCDLX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCDLX achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than JLKYX's 12.46% return.

PCDLX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 6.62%
• 6M: 6.04%
• 1Y: 16.92%
• 3Y*: 15.56%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: —

JLKYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 12.46%
• 6M: 11.72%
• 1Y: 27.54%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: 11.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCDLX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PCDLX Putnam Retirement Advantage 2035 Fund	6.62%	14.56%	10.81%	23.95%	-15.18%	13.08%	14.49%
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	12.46%	20.04%	15.41%	18.53%	-18.04%	18.38%	16.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PCDLX and JLKYX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.97

The correlation between PCDLX and JLKYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PCDLX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCDLX

PCDLX Risk / Return Rank: 74
PCDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
PCDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
PCDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PCDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PCDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

JLKYX

JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 70
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCDLX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2035 Fund (PCDLX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCDLX	JLKYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	2.25	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	3.06	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.41	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	3.14	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.35	13.61	+0.74

PCDLX vs. JLKYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCDLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the JLKYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCDLX and JLKYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCDLX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCDLX drawdown since its inception was -24.78%, smaller than the maximum JLKYX drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCDLX and JLKYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCDLX	JLKYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.78%	-32.55%	+7.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.40%	-9.16%	+3.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.80%	-16.11%	+5.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.51%	-25.75%	+5.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-0.42%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.62%	-4.65%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.24%	2.11%	-0.87%

Volatility

PCDLX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2035 Fund (PCDLX) is 3.20%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that PCDLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLKYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCDLX	JLKYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	4.99%	-1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.46%	10.52%	-4.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.93%	12.79%	-4.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.08%	15.33%	-4.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.07%	16.25%	-3.18%

PCDLX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCDLX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JLKYX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCDLX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison

PCDLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.39%, more than JLKYX's 3.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	3.21%	3.61%	1.77%	2.16%	8.08%	5.71%	3.88%	8.54%	10.69%	4.33%	3.23%	1.75%
PCDLX Putnam Retirement Advantage 2035 Fund	9.39%	10.02%	6.60%	4.41%	8.70%	14.61%	1.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCDLX and JLKYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, PCDLX and JLKYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PCDLX or JLKYX?

JLKYX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to PCDLX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCDLX dropped -24.78% vs JLKYX's -32.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JLKYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.