PCCE vs. DRGN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PCCE (Polen Capital China Growth ETF) and DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCCE is a China Equities fund actively managed by Polen, while DRGN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BITA China Generative AI Select Index. PCCE is actively managed, while DRGN is passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCCE charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DRGN.

Performance

PCCE vs. DRGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen Capital China Growth ETF (PCCE) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCCE achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly lower than DRGN's 15.39% return.

PCCE

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: -1.49%
• 6M: -1.95%
• 1Y: 4.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRGN

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 4.18%
• YTD: 15.39%
• 6M: 15.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCCE vs. DRGN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCCE Polen Capital China Growth ETF	-1.49%	3.95%
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	15.39%	26.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PCCE and DRGN is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.67

Return for Risk

PCCE vs. DRGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCCE

PCCE Risk / Return Rank: 13
PCCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
PCCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PCCE Omega Ratio Rank: 13
PCCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
PCCE Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCCE vs. DRGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital China Growth ETF (PCCE) and Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCCE	DRGN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.51	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.68	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCCE	DRGN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	1.52	-0.96

Drawdowns

PCCE vs. DRGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCCE drawdown since its inception was -26.38%, which is greater than DRGN's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCCE and DRGN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCCE	DRGN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.38%	-20.86%	-5.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.10%	-7.97%	-2.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.93%	-7.93%	-2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.33%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCCE	DRGN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.84%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.92%	34.79%	-15.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.19%	34.79%	-8.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.19%	34.79%	-8.60%

PCCE vs. DRGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCCE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGN's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCCE vs. DRGN - Dividend Comparison

PCCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than DRGN's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	1.05%	1.22%	0.00%
PCCE Polen Capital China Growth ETF	2.32%	2.29%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCCE and DRGN in my portfolio?

PCCE and DRGN have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PCCE or DRGN?

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PCCE or DRGN?

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PCCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PCCE or DRGN?

PCCE has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 1.05% for DRGN.

What is the main difference between PCCE and DRGN?

PCCE is categorized as China Equities, while DRGN is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Polen and Themes. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for PCCE and 0.39% for DRGN.