PCBIX vs. TGFRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX) and Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX).
PCBIX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Dec 6, 2000. TGFRX is managed by Tanaka. It was launched on Dec 30, 1998.
Performance
PCBIX vs. TGFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCBIX vs. TGFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCBIX Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class | -11.07% | 1.62% | 23.63% | 25.92% | -23.16% | 25.22% | 18.25% | 49.40% | -6.86% | 25.32% |
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | 2.11% | 39.56% | 17.98% | 50.24% | -22.62% | 26.54% | 50.87% | 18.78% | -25.18% | 7.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCBIX achieves a -11.07% return, which is significantly lower than TGFRX's 2.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PCBIX has underperformed TGFRX with an annualized return of 11.72%, while TGFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.73% annualized return.
PCBIX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- -11.07%
- 6M
- -13.70%
- 1Y
- -9.77%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
TGFRX
- 1D
- 5.92%
- 1M
- -7.38%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 3.42%
- 1Y
- 38.93%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCBIX vs. TGFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCBIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than TGFRX's 2.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCBIX vs. TGFRX — Risk / Return Rank
PCBIX
TGFRX
PCBIX vs. TGFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX) and Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCBIX | TGFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | 1.06 | -1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | 1.59 | -2.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.20 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 2.93 | -3.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 7.48 | -8.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCBIX | TGFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | 1.06 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.01 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.02 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.02 | +0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCBIX and TGFRX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PCBIX vs. TGFRX - Dividend Comparison
PCBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, less than TGFRX's 12.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCBIX Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class | 6.54% | 5.81% | 6.40% | 2.51% | 3.18% | 7.96% | 1.08% | 9.02% | 12.24% | 3.31% | 2.49% | 6.30% |
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | 12.75% | 13.02% | 6.89% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 7.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PCBIX vs. TGFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCBIX drawdown since its inception was -50.25%, smaller than the maximum TGFRX drawdown of -95.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCBIX and TGFRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCBIX | TGFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.25% | -95.35% | +45.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.29% | -16.01% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.17% | -95.35% | +64.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | -95.35% | +54.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.88% | -92.38% | +75.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -31.67% | +25.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.53% | 7.24% | -0.71% |
Volatility
PCBIX vs. TGFRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX) is 5.24%, while Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) has a volatility of 12.37%. This indicates that PCBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCBIX | TGFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 12.37% | -7.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | 24.40% | -13.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.38% | 35.36% | -16.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 793.45% | -774.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 561.16% | -542.06% |