PCBAX vs. ECAT
PCBAX (BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund) and ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) are both mutual funds - PCBAX is a Macro Trading fund managed by BlackRock, while ECAT is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 3 years, PCBAX returned 9.37%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for ECAT. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCBAX charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for ECAT.
Performance
PCBAX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCBAX achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than ECAT's 11.26% return.
PCBAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- 1Y
- 13.63%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 5.88%
ECAT
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 11.26%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCBAX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCBAX BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund | 9.60% | 6.16% | 11.77% | 2.37% | 5.77% | -1.41% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 11.26% | 16.64% | 19.96% | 32.36% | -21.90% | -6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCBAX and ECAT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021 | 0.17 |
The correlation between PCBAX and ECAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCBAX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank
PCBAX
ECAT
PCBAX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCBAX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.27 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.55 | 1.79 | +2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 6.64 | +4.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCBAX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.55%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCBAX and ECAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCBAX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.55% | -32.23% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -11.80% | +8.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.75% | -15.79% | +9.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -1.17% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -9.03% | +4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 3.17% | -1.92% |
Volatility
PCBAX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX) is 1.12%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that PCBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCBAX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 4.44% | -3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.71% | 11.00% | -6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.72% | 13.79% | -8.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.46% | 16.89% | -10.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.13% | 16.89% | -10.76% |
PCBAX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCBAX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCBAX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison
PCBAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ECAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 21.94% | 23.00% | 17.44% | 9.14% | 8.94% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCBAX BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.67% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 2.44% | 3.08% | 9.91% | 0.80% | 1.41% | 4.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCBAX and ECAT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECAT has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to PCBAX (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCBAX dropped -39.55% vs ECAT's -32.23%.
PCBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCBAX and ECAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer