PBW vs. JPSE
PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) and JPSE (JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - PBW tracks the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX) while JPSE tracks the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Small Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PBW returned -14.27%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for JPSE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBW charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for JPSE.
Performance
PBW vs. JPSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBW achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly lower than JPSE's 19.12% return.
PBW
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -14.83%
- 6M
- -0.86%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 55.86%
- 3Y*
- -4.93%
- 5Y*
- -14.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
JPSE
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- YTD
- 19.12%
- 1Y
- 29.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- —
PBW vs. JPSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 12.09% | 53.96% | -30.77% | -20.03% | -44.55% | -29.86% | 204.82% | 62.58% | -14.11% | 39.92% |
JPSE JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 19.12% | 8.77% | 8.07% | 15.87% | -14.40% | 29.31% | 12.49% | 22.95% | -8.61% | 14.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBW and JPSE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2016 | 0.70 |
The correlation between PBW and JPSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
PBW vs. JPSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBW
JPSE
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
PBW
JPSE
Basic Materials
PBW
JPSE
Energy
PBW
JPSE
Consumer Cyclical
PBW
JPSE
Technology
PBW
JPSE
Utilities
PBW
JPSE
Consumer Defensive
PBW
JPSE
Financial Services
PBW
JPSE
Communication Services
PBW
-
JPSE
Healthcare
PBW
-
JPSE
Real Estate
PBW
-
JPSE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBW vs. JPSE — Risk / Return Rank
PBW
JPSE
PBW vs. JPSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBW | JPSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 3.70 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.82 | 13.20 | -7.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBW vs. JPSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBW drawdown since its inception was -89.02%, which is greater than JPSE's maximum drawdown of -43.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBW and JPSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBW | JPSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.02% | -43.02% | -46.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.22% | -8.00% | -19.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.04% | -25.49% | -42.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.50% | -25.56% | -58.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.75% | -1.30% | -70.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.92% | -7.35% | -55.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.62% | 2.24% | +7.38% |
Volatility
PBW vs. JPSE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a higher volatility of 14.18% compared to JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE) at 3.57%. This indicates that PBW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBW | JPSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.18% | 3.57% | +10.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.08% | 11.07% | +21.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.18% | 15.95% | +27.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.54% | 20.01% | +23.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.09% | 21.74% | +17.35% |
PBW vs. JPSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBW has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than JPSE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBW vs. JPSE - Dividend Comparison
PBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than JPSE's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSE JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.33% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.76% | 1.55% | 1.24% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 1.18% | 0.74% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 1.39% | 0.79% | 2.84% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 1.71% | 0.44% | 1.45% | 2.04% | 1.28% | 2.68% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBW and JPSE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBW has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to JPSE (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBW dropped -89.02% vs JPSE's -43.02%.
On 5-year performance, JPSE leads with 8.49% vs -14.27% for PBW. On fees, JPSE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JPSE has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JPSE has performed better with a 8.49% return vs -14.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPSE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PBW.
PBW has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.33% for JPSE.
PBW tracks The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX), while JPSE tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Small Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PBW and 0.29% for JPSE.
JPSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBW and JPSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer