PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBTP vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBTP vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBTP achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.


PBTP

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.15%
6M
2.14%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBTP vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
2.15%5.98%4.72%4.53%-3.02%5.51%4.89%4.72%0.59%0.04%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PBTP and QQQ is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017

0.11

The correlation between PBTP and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PBTP vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBTP
QQQ

Financial Services

0.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

PBTP
0.0%
QQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

PBTP

-

QQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

PBTP

-

QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PBTP

-

QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

PBTP

-

QQQ
7.7%

Energy

PBTP

-

QQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

PBTP

-

QQQ
4.2%

Industrials

PBTP

-

QQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

PBTP

-

QQQ
0.1%

Technology

PBTP

-

QQQ
53.8%

Utilities

PBTP

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBTP vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBTP
PBTP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PBTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBTP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PBTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBTP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBTP vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBTPQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.45

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.08

3.51

+3.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.51

13.49

+11.02

PBTP vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBTP Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBTP and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBTPQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

2.64

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.81

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.41

+0.89

Drawdowns

PBTP vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBTP drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBTP and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBTPQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-82.97%

+77.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.66%

-11.96%

+11.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

-22.77%

+21.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.44%

-35.12%

+29.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.26%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-32.79%

+32.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

3.11%

-2.92%

Volatility

PBTP vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) is 0.40%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that PBTP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBTPQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

4.49%

-4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

12.10%

-11.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54%

15.94%

-14.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.85%

22.38%

-19.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

22.29%

-19.65%

PBTP vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBTP has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PBTP vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

PBTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
3.10%3.82%2.59%2.36%5.33%3.12%1.25%2.12%2.33%0.73%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBTP and QQQ have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to PBTP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBTP dropped -5.44% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 3.32% for PBTP. On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PBTP has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 3.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

PBTP has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

PBTP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. PBTP tracks ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for PBTP and 0.18% for QQQ.

PBTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBTP and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer