PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBTP vs. ICPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBTP vs. ICPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) and iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBTP achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than ICPI's 2.44% return.


PBTP

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.44%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*

ICPI

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
2.44%
6M
2.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBTP vs. ICPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PBTP and ICPI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBTP vs. ICPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBTP
PBTP Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PBTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBTP Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PBTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBTP Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

ICPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBTP vs. ICPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) and iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBTPICPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.63

PBTP vs. ICPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBTP vs. ICPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBTP drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, which is greater than ICPI's maximum drawdown of -0.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBTP and ICPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBTPICPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-0.32%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.32%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-0.04%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

Volatility

PBTP vs. ICPI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBTPICPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62%

0.96%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.85%

0.96%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.64%

0.96%

+1.68%

PBTP vs. ICPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBTP has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ICPI's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PBTP vs. ICPI - Dividend Comparison

PBTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than ICPI's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ICPI
iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF
1.80%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
5.86%3.82%2.59%2.36%5.33%3.12%1.25%2.12%2.33%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBTP and ICPI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ICPI.

PBTP has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 1.80% for ICPI.

PBTP tracks ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y), while ICPI tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Inflation Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for PBTP and 0.09% for ICPI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBTP and ICPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer