ICPI vs. SCHP
ICPI (iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - ICPI tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Inflation Linked Bond Index while SCHP tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. ICPI charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
ICPI vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICPI achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.81% return.
ICPI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 3.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
ICPI vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ICPI iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 2.48% | 0.32% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.81% | -0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICPI and SCHP is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICPI vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
ICPI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHP
ICPI vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ICPI | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ICPI vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICPI drawdown since its inception was -0.32%, smaller than the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICPI and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICPI | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -14.26% | +13.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -1.04% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -3.92% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.65% | — |
Volatility
ICPI vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICPI | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96% | 3.35% | -2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.96% | 6.11% | -5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.96% | 5.59% | -4.63% |
ICPI vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICPI has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ICPI vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
ICPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than SCHP's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICPI iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.80% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.02% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICPI and SCHP have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ICPI.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 1.80% for ICPI.
ICPI tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Inflation Linked Bond Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ICPI and 0.03% for SCHP.
Find the right allocation for ICPI and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer