PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ICPI vs. SCHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ICPI vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICPI achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 1.61% return.


ICPI

1D
0.05%
1M
0.44%
YTD
2.70%
6M
2.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHP

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.14%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
1.13%
10Y*
2.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ICPI vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ICPI
iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF
2.70%0.32%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
1.61%-0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ICPI and SCHP is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ICPI vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ICPI

SCHP
SCHP Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ICPI vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF (ICPI) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ICPI vs. SCHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ICPISCHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.20

0.51

+5.69

Drawdowns

ICPI vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICPI drawdown since its inception was -0.22%, smaller than the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICPI and SCHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ICPISCHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-14.26%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-3.94%

+3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

Volatility

ICPI vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ICPISCHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95%

3.30%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.95%

6.12%

-5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.95%

5.59%

-4.64%

ICPI vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICPI has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ICPI vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison

ICPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than SCHP's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICPI
iShares 0-1 Year TIPS Bond ETF
1.80%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
3.99%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


ICPI and SCHP have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ICPI.

SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 1.80% for ICPI.

ICPI tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Inflation Linked Bond Index, while SCHP tracks Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ICPI and 0.05% for SCHP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ICPI and SCHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer