PBSIX vs. EMCAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBSIX (Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund) and EMCAX (Empiric 2500 Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PBSIX returned 3.73%/yr vs 4.28%/yr for EMCAX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBSIX charges 1.26%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for EMCAX.

Performance

PBSIX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBSIX achieves a 32.14% return, which is significantly higher than EMCAX's 11.03% return.

PBSIX

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: 7.01%
• YTD: 32.14%
• 6M: 27.42%
• 1Y: 58.34%
• 3Y*: 19.29%
• 5Y*: 3.73%
• 10Y*: —

EMCAX

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 6M: 7.84%
• 1Y: 16.32%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: 4.28%
• 10Y*: 10.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBSIX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBSIX Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund	32.14%	12.05%	3.75%	21.83%	-42.90%	16.44%	50.02%	21.22%	1.96%	1.42%
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund	11.03%	2.37%	13.89%	12.43%	-16.06%	16.07%	27.81%	19.10%	-4.64%	3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PBSIX and EMCAX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2017	0.83

The correlation between PBSIX and EMCAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PBSIX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBSIX

PBSIX Risk / Return Rank: 64
PBSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
PBSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PBSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
PBSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PBSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

EMCAX

EMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 23
EMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
EMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
EMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
EMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
EMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBSIX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBSIX	EMCAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.20	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	1.85	+0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.21	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.67	1.98	+2.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.71	7.46	+9.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBSIX vs. EMCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the EMCAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBSIX and EMCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBSIX	EMCAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	1.20	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.24	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.46	-0.08

Drawdowns

PBSIX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBSIX drawdown since its inception was -52.49%, roughly equal to the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBSIX and EMCAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBSIX	EMCAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.49%	-51.81%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.67%	-8.60%	-5.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.03%	-19.19%	-8.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.49%	-30.60%	-21.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.37%	-2.58%	-1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.57%	-13.27%	-8.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.77%	2.28%	+1.49%

Volatility

PBSIX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison

Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund (PBSIX) has a higher volatility of 11.01% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 4.64%. This indicates that PBSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBSIX	EMCAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.01%	4.64%	+6.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.96%	11.27%	+10.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.08%	14.15%	+14.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.76%	18.17%	+10.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.57%	20.24%	+7.33%

PBSIX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBSIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBSIX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison

PBSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund	0.12%	0.13%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.51%	7.46%	0.00%	0.00%
PBSIX Polen U.S. Small Company Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.60%	0.11%	0.48%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBSIX and EMCAX in my portfolio?

PBSIX and EMCAX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBSIX or EMCAX?

PBSIX has higher volatility (11.01%) compared to EMCAX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBSIX dropped -52.49% vs EMCAX's -51.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.