PBQQ vs. UAPR
PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) and UAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. PBQQ is actively managed, while UAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, PBQQ returned 28.19% vs 18.25% for UAPR. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBQQ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UAPR.
Performance
PBQQ vs. UAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBQQ achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than UAPR's 5.11% return.
PBQQ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UAPR
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 18.25%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- —
PBQQ vs. UAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 4.74% | 15.44% |
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April | 5.11% | 6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBQQ and UAPR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PBQQ and UAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBQQ vs. UAPR — Risk / Return Rank
PBQQ
UAPR
PBQQ vs. UAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBQQ | UAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.46 | 4.42 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.32 | 7.97 | -2.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 2.22 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 15.55 | -10.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.21 | 72.17 | -45.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBQQ | UAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 4.42 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.58 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
PBQQ vs. UAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBQQ drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum UAPR drawdown of -14.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQQ and UAPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBQQ | UAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -14.61% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.71% | -1.10% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -3.37% | +2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.24% | +0.75% |
Volatility
PBQQ vs. UAPR - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) at 1.55%. This indicates that PBQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBQQ | UAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 1.55% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.87% | 2.39% | +3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.22% | 4.16% | +4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 6.90% | +5.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 8.49% | +3.86% |
PBQQ vs. UAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBQQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than UAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBQQ vs. UAPR - Dividend Comparison
PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while UAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.17% |