PBQQ vs. EBUF
PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) and EBUF (Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PBQQ returned 28.19% vs 18.96% for EBUF. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBQQ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EBUF.
Performance
PBQQ vs. EBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBQQ achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than EBUF's 7.88% return.
PBQQ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EBUF
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBQQ vs. EBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 4.74% | 15.44% |
EBUF Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 7.88% | 11.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBQQ and EBUF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PBQQ and EBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBQQ vs. EBUF — Risk / Return Rank
PBQQ
EBUF
PBQQ vs. EBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBQQ | EBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.46 | 3.53 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.32 | 6.11 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.94 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 10.30 | -4.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.21 | 43.31 | -17.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBQQ | EBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 3.53 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 1.89 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
PBQQ vs. EBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBQQ drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, which is greater than EBUF's maximum drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQQ and EBUF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBQQ | EBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -6.49% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.71% | -1.82% | -2.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -0.51% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.43% | +0.56% |
Volatility
PBQQ vs. EBUF - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) have volatilities of 3.56% and 3.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBQQ | EBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 3.49% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.87% | 4.59% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.22% | 5.42% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 6.72% | +5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 6.72% | +5.63% |
PBQQ vs. EBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBQQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EBUF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBQQ vs. EBUF - Dividend Comparison
PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while EBUF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
EBUF Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% |