PBQQ vs. BAPR
PBQQ (PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. PBQQ is actively managed, while BAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, PBQQ returned 28.19% vs 27.38% for BAPR. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBQQ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for BAPR.
Performance
PBQQ vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBQQ achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 7.98% return.
PBQQ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.21%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAPR
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 27.38%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- —
PBQQ vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 4.74% | 15.44% |
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 7.98% | 8.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBQQ and BAPR is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | 0.90 |
The correlation between PBQQ and BAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBQQ vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank
PBQQ
BAPR
PBQQ vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBQQ | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.46 | 3.95 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.32 | 6.67 | -1.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 2.04 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.53 | 13.14 | -7.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.21 | 63.68 | -37.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBQQ | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 3.95 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.81 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
PBQQ vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBQQ drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQQ and BAPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBQQ | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.92% | -23.91% | +10.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.71% | -1.93% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -2.64% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.40% | +0.59% |
Volatility
PBQQ vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF (PBQQ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) have volatilities of 3.56% and 3.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBQQ | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 3.66% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.87% | 4.61% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.22% | 7.00% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 11.56% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 13.23% | -0.88% |
PBQQ vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBQQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBQQ vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison
PBQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while BAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBQQ PGIM Laddered Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |