PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBQAX vs. FGKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBQAX vs. FGKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Blend Fund (PBQAX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBQAX achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly lower than FGKFX's 22.73% return.


PBQAX

1D
0.04%
1M
2.68%
YTD
13.12%
6M
11.58%
1Y
27.32%
3Y*
25.97%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
16.31%

FGKFX

1D
-1.20%
1M
1.38%
YTD
22.73%
6M
16.53%
1Y
48.45%
3Y*
31.24%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBQAX vs. FGKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PBQAX
PGIM Jennison Blend Fund
13.12%12.23%39.83%27.48%-24.86%20.82%27.11%18.93%
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
22.73%21.67%35.46%46.02%-32.62%22.06%68.76%15.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PBQAX and FGKFX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.90

The correlation between PBQAX and FGKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBQAX vs. FGKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBQAX
PBQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PBQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PBQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FGKFX
FGKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FGKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FGKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBQAX vs. FGKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Blend Fund (PBQAX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBQAXFGKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

4.40

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.72

17.06

-3.34

PBQAX vs. FGKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBQAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the FGKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBQAX and FGKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBQAX vs. FGKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBQAX drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, which is greater than FGKFX's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQAX and FGKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBQAXFGKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.89%

-40.14%

-13.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-11.40%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.80%

-27.38%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.22%

-40.14%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-1.75%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-9.96%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.93%

-0.82%

Volatility

PBQAX vs. FGKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Blend Fund (PBQAX) is 5.25%, while Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that PBQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBQAXFGKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

7.66%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

15.78%

-4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

19.83%

-5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

24.33%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.51%

25.79%

-5.28%

PBQAX vs. FGKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBQAX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FGKFX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBQAX vs. FGKFX - Dividend Comparison

PBQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.82%, while FGKFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.18%2.64%0.93%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBQAX
PGIM Jennison Blend Fund
8.82%9.97%26.50%3.03%1.93%19.07%7.79%13.20%12.89%9.28%6.82%11.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBQAX and FGKFX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGKFX has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to PBQAX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBQAX dropped -53.89% vs FGKFX's -40.14%.

FGKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBQAX and FGKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer