PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBQAX vs. CTCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBQAX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Blend Fund (PBQAX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBQAX achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly lower than CTCAX's 32.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PBQAX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 15.59%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.75% annualized return.


PBQAX

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.88%
YTD
11.66%
6M
12.35%
1Y
27.69%
3Y*
25.77%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
15.59%

CTCAX

1D
1.47%
1M
17.00%
YTD
32.06%
6M
31.15%
1Y
61.81%
3Y*
36.07%
5Y*
20.96%
10Y*
24.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBQAX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBQAX
PGIM Jennison Blend Fund
11.66%12.23%39.83%27.48%-24.86%20.82%27.11%37.21%-7.83%21.58%
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
32.06%24.78%31.39%56.46%-34.81%22.73%49.46%43.91%-1.48%42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PBQAX and CTCAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2002

0.88

The correlation between PBQAX and CTCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBQAX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBQAX
PBQAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PBQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PBQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

CTCAX
CTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBQAX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Blend Fund (PBQAX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBQAXCTCAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

3.04

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

3.68

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.49

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

4.43

-1.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.70

16.56

-2.86

PBQAX vs. CTCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the CTCAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBQAX and CTCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBQAXCTCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

3.04

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.81

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

1.00

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.78

-0.23

Drawdowns

PBQAX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBQAX drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, smaller than the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBQAX and CTCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBQAXCTCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.89%

-61.04%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-14.43%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.80%

-26.67%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.22%

-39.55%

+7.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.90%

-39.55%

+2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-10.68%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

3.86%

-1.78%

Volatility

PBQAX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Blend Fund (PBQAX) is 3.82%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that PBQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBQAXCTCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

6.37%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

16.72%

-6.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

21.06%

-7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.21%

25.98%

-5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

24.84%

-4.37%

PBQAX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBQAX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBQAX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison

PBQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, more than CTCAX's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTCAX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A
2.49%3.29%1.08%2.36%3.53%4.15%0.91%2.55%5.82%3.52%0.36%1.80%
PBQAX
PGIM Jennison Blend Fund
8.93%9.97%26.50%3.03%1.93%19.07%7.79%13.20%12.89%9.28%6.82%11.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBQAX and CTCAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTCAX has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to PBQAX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBQAX dropped -53.89% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.

CTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBQAX and CTCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer