PBPH vs. XPH
PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) and XPH (SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index while XPH tracks the S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBPH charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XPH.
Performance
PBPH vs. XPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBPH achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than XPH's 3.48% return.
PBPH
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XPH
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 41.81%
- 3Y*
- 14.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- 3.57%
PBPH vs. XPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 1.75% | 0.76% |
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 3.48% | 3.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBPH and XPH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBPH vs. XPH — Risk / Return Rank
PBPH
XPH
PBPH vs. XPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH) and SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBPH | XPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.39 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
PBPH vs. XPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBPH drawdown since its inception was -11.10%, smaller than the maximum XPH drawdown of -48.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBPH and XPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBPH | XPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -48.03% | +36.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -4.63% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -17.25% | +13.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility
PBPH vs. XPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBPH | XPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 21.68% | -4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 20.88% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 22.11% | -4.91% |
PBPH vs. XPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBPH has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XPH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBPH vs. XPH - Dividend Comparison
PBPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than XPH's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.64% | 0.83% | 1.58% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 0.95% | 0.47% | 0.64% | 0.65% | 0.67% | 0.63% | 7.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBPH and XPH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XPH.
XPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index, while XPH tracks S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Block and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBPH and 0.35% for XPH.
Find the right allocation for PBPH and XPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer