PBPH vs. XPH
PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) and XPH (SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index while XPH tracks the S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBPH charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XPH.
Performance
PBPH vs. XPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBPH achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than XPH's 20.41% return.
PBPH
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XPH
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 20.37%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 1Y
- 60.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 5.30%
PBPH vs. XPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 7.57% | 0.74% |
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 20.41% | 5.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBPH and XPH is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBPH vs. XPH — Risk / Return Rank
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XPH
PBPH vs. XPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH) and SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBPH | XPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBPH vs. XPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBPH drawdown since its inception was -11.10%, smaller than the maximum XPH drawdown of -48.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBPH and XPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBPH | XPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -48.03% | +36.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -3.93% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -17.16% | +13.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility
PBPH vs. XPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBPH | XPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.85% | 22.35% | -4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 21.07% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 22.10% | -4.25% |
PBPH vs. XPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBPH has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than XPH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBPH vs. XPH - Dividend Comparison
PBPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than XPH's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.50% | 0.83% | 1.58% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 0.95% | 0.47% | 0.64% | 0.65% | 0.67% | 0.63% | 7.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBPH and XPH have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XPH.
XPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.08% for PBPH.
PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index, while XPH tracks S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Block and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBPH and 0.35% for XPH.
Find the right allocation for PBPH and XPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer