PBPH vs. GSKH
PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) and GSKH (GSK plc ADRhedged ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index while GSKH tracks the GSK plc Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBPH charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for GSKH.
Performance
PBPH vs. GSKH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBPH achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than GSKH's 9.90% return.
PBPH
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSKH
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 42.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBPH vs. GSKH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 2.63% | 0.74% |
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 9.90% | 1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBPH and GSKH is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBPH vs. GSKH — Risk / Return Rank
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GSKH
PBPH vs. GSKH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH) and GSK plc ADRhedged ETF (GSKH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBPH | GSKH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBPH vs. GSKH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBPH drawdown since its inception was -11.10%, smaller than the maximum GSKH drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBPH and GSKH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBPH | GSKH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -18.54% | +7.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.21% | -11.62% | +6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -5.86% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.06% | — |
Volatility
PBPH vs. GSKH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBPH | GSKH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.07% | 26.14% | -9.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 26.95% | -9.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 26.95% | -9.88% |
PBPH vs. GSKH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBPH has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than GSKH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PBPH vs. GSKH - Dividend Comparison
PBPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than GSKH's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GSKH GSK plc ADRhedged ETF | 2.82% | 1.15% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBPH and GSKH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for GSKH.
GSKH has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index, while GSKH tracks GSK plc Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Block and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBPH and 0.19% for GSKH.
Find the right allocation for PBPH and GSKH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer