PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBP vs. FTQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBP vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBP achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 12.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PBP has underperformed FTQI with an annualized return of 7.23%, while FTQI has yielded a comparatively higher 7.85% annualized return.


PBP

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.86%
6M
6.34%
YTD
7.22%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
11.78%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
7.23%

FTQI

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.28%
6M
11.68%
YTD
12.76%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBP vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
7.22%8.49%19.83%11.59%-11.82%19.97%-3.31%14.60%-5.57%11.98%
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
12.76%12.68%18.30%23.63%-8.77%10.46%-6.54%13.98%-9.78%12.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PBP and FTQI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014

0.51

Over the past year, PBP and FTQI have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

PBP vs. FTQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBP
FTQI

Technology

39.0%
49.4%

Financial Services

11.1%
5.5%

Communication Services

10.6%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
10.5%

Healthcare

8.3%
6.0%

Industrials

7.8%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
6.2%

Energy

3.1%
2.3%

Utilities

2.1%
1.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.4%

Technology

PBP
39.0%
FTQI
49.4%

Financial Services

PBP
11.1%
FTQI
5.5%

Communication Services

PBP
10.6%
FTQI
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PBP
9.9%
FTQI
10.5%

Healthcare

PBP
8.3%
FTQI
6.0%

Industrials

PBP
7.8%
FTQI
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

PBP
4.5%
FTQI
6.2%

Energy

PBP
3.1%
FTQI
2.3%

Utilities

PBP
2.1%
FTQI
1.5%

Real Estate

PBP
1.8%
FTQI
1.3%

Basic Materials

PBP
1.7%
FTQI
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBP vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBP
PBP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBP vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBPFTQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.45

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

4.24

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.50

20.07

-2.58

PBP vs. FTQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBP Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the FTQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBP and FTQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBP vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBP drawdown since its inception was -43.43%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBP and FTQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBPFTQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.43%

-19.42%

-24.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

-6.24%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-19.42%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

-19.42%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

-19.42%

-13.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.85%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-3.73%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.32%

-0.31%

Volatility

PBP vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) is 1.59%, while First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that PBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBPFTQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

2.92%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.04%

8.83%

-2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.23%

10.87%

-3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.86%

14.82%

-2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.65%

12.98%

+0.67%

PBP vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBP vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison

PBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.06%, more than FTQI's 10.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
10.92%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
11.06%11.12%9.36%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.04%2.59%10.86%2.56%6.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBP and FTQI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTQI has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to PBP (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBP dropped -43.43% vs FTQI's -19.42%.

On 10-year performance, FTQI leads with 7.85% vs 7.23% for PBP. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 1.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTQI has performed better with a 7.85% return vs 7.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.06%, compared with 10.92% for FTQI.

PBP is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. PBP tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while FTQI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PBP and 0.75% for FTQI.

PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBP and FTQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer