PBP vs. FTQI
PBP (Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBP is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PBP returned 7.23%/yr vs 7.85%/yr for FTQI. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.
Performance
PBP vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBP achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 12.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PBP has underperformed FTQI with an annualized return of 7.23%, while FTQI has yielded a comparatively higher 7.85% annualized return.
PBP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.23%
FTQI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 11.68%
- YTD
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- 26.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
PBP vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 7.22% | 8.49% | 19.83% | 11.59% | -11.82% | 19.97% | -3.31% | 14.60% | -5.57% | 11.98% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 12.76% | 12.68% | 18.30% | 23.63% | -8.77% | 10.46% | -6.54% | 13.98% | -9.78% | 12.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBP and FTQI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, PBP and FTQI have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.
PBP vs. FTQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBP
FTQI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PBP
FTQI
Financial Services
PBP
FTQI
Communication Services
PBP
FTQI
Consumer Cyclical
PBP
FTQI
Healthcare
PBP
FTQI
Industrials
PBP
FTQI
Consumer Defensive
PBP
FTQI
Energy
PBP
FTQI
Utilities
PBP
FTQI
Real Estate
PBP
FTQI
Basic Materials
PBP
FTQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBP vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank
PBP
FTQI
PBP vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBP | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.45 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 4.24 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.50 | 20.07 | -2.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBP vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBP drawdown since its inception was -43.43%, which is greater than FTQI's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBP and FTQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBP | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.43% | -19.42% | -24.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.22% | -6.24% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -19.42% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -19.42% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | -19.42% | -13.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.85% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -3.73% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 1.32% | -0.31% |
Volatility
PBP vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) is 1.59%, while First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that PBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBP | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.59% | 2.92% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.04% | 8.83% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.23% | 10.87% | -3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.86% | 14.82% | -2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 12.98% | +0.67% |
PBP vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBP vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison
PBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.06%, more than FTQI's 10.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.92% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 11.06% | 11.12% | 9.36% | 3.35% | 1.33% | 6.21% | 1.41% | 5.04% | 2.59% | 10.86% | 2.56% | 6.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBP and FTQI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTQI has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to PBP (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBP dropped -43.43% vs FTQI's -19.42%.
On 10-year performance, FTQI leads with 7.85% vs 7.23% for PBP. On fees, PBP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 1.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTQI has performed better with a 7.85% return vs 7.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTQI.
PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.06%, compared with 10.92% for FTQI.
PBP is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. PBP tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while FTQI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PBP and 0.75% for FTQI.
PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBP and FTQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer