PBOT vs. AIFD
PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) and AIFD (TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBOT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIFD.
Performance
PBOT vs. AIFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBOT achieves a 22.92% return, which is significantly lower than AIFD's 33.97% return.
PBOT
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 19.50%
- YTD
- 22.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AIFD
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- 6M
- 31.55%
- YTD
- 33.97%
- 1Y
- 60.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 36.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $602.48K | $789.28K | $1.21M | |
| $23.32K | $22.92K | $19.40K |
PBOT vs. AIFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 22.92% | 0.33% |
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF | 33.97% | 4.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBOT and AIFD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBOT vs. AIFD — Risk / Return Rank
PBOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AIFD
PBOT vs. AIFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBOT | AIFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBOT vs. AIFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBOT drawdown since its inception was -15.78%, smaller than the maximum AIFD drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBOT and AIFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBOT | AIFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.78% | -33.20% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.71% | -12.13% | +3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -5.87% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.25% | — |
Volatility
PBOT vs. AIFD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBOT | AIFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.94% | 29.32% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 30.27% | -3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 30.27% | -3.33% |
PBOT vs. AIFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBOT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than AIFD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBOT vs. AIFD - Dividend Comparison
PBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 0.08% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBOT and AIFD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIFD.
PBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.
They also come from different issuers: Pictet and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for PBOT and 0.75% for AIFD.
Find the right allocation for PBOT and AIFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer