PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBOG vs. RSPG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBOG vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBOG achieves a 32.22% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 34.27% return.


PBOG

1D
1.23%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
32.22%
6M
29.70%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSPG

1D
1.25%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
34.27%
6M
28.95%
1Y
47.49%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
21.10%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBOG vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PBOG and RSPG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBOG vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBOG

RSPG
RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBOG vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PBOG vs. RSPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBOGRSPGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.31

0.18

+3.13

Drawdowns

PBOG vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBOG drawdown since its inception was -11.45%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBOG and RSPG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBOGRSPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.45%

-79.98%

+68.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.81%

-5.67%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-25.47%

+22.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

Volatility

PBOG vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBOGRSPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.67%

21.69%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.67%

28.31%

-4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

33.57%

-9.90%

PBOG vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBOG has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBOG vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison

PBOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than RSPG's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBOG
Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF
0.13%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
1.94%2.60%2.43%2.84%3.43%2.37%3.15%2.15%2.18%2.55%1.14%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PBOG and RSPG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.

RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.

PBOG is categorized as Oil & Gas, while RSPG is Energy Equities. PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index, while RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Blocks and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBOG and 0.40% for RSPG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBOG and RSPG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer