PBOG vs. RSPG
PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) and RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBOG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index, while RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBOG charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPG.
Performance
PBOG vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBOG achieves a 32.22% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 34.27% return.
PBOG
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 32.22%
- 6M
- 29.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPG
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 34.27%
- 6M
- 28.95%
- 1Y
- 47.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 21.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
PBOG vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 32.22% | 1.62% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 34.27% | 0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBOG and RSPG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBOG vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank
PBOG
RSPG
PBOG vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBOG | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.31 | 0.18 | +3.13 |
Drawdowns
PBOG vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBOG drawdown since its inception was -11.45%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBOG and RSPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBOG | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -79.98% | +68.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -5.67% | -1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -25.47% | +22.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.11% | — |
Volatility
PBOG vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBOG | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.67% | 21.69% | +1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 28.31% | -4.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.67% | 33.57% | -9.90% |
PBOG vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBOG has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBOG vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison
PBOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than RSPG's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 1.94% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PBOG and RSPG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.
RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.
PBOG is categorized as Oil & Gas, while RSPG is Energy Equities. PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index, while RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Blocks and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBOG and 0.40% for RSPG.
Find the right allocation for PBOG and RSPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer