PBOG vs. BILD
PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) and BILD (Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. PBOG is passively managed, while BILD is actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBOG charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BILD.
Performance
PBOG vs. BILD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBOG achieves a 20.33% return, which is significantly higher than BILD's 7.62% return.
PBOG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 20.33%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILD
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 7.62%
- 6M
- 7.81%
- 1Y
- 16.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG vs. BILD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 20.33% | 1.39% |
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF | 7.62% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBOG and BILD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBOG vs. BILD — Risk / Return Rank
PBOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BILD
PBOG vs. BILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBOG | BILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBOG vs. BILD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBOG drawdown since its inception was -16.46%, which is greater than BILD's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBOG and BILD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBOG | BILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.46% | -14.78% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.19% | -4.71% | -10.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -3.72% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.37% | — |
Volatility
PBOG vs. BILD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBOG | BILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 10.86% | +13.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 13.15% | +10.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 13.15% | +10.80% |
PBOG vs. BILD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBOG has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than BILD's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PBOG vs. BILD - Dividend Comparison
PBOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than BILD's 5.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BILD Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF | 5.81% | 3.05% | 5.53% | 0.52% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PBOG and BILD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BILD.
BILD has the higher dividend yield at 5.81%, compared with 0.14% for PBOG.
They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Blocks and Macquarie. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBOG and 0.49% for BILD.
Find the right allocation for PBOG and BILD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer