PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBNV vs. SMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBNV vs. SMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November (PBNV) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBNV achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly higher than SMAX's 2.98% return.


PBNV

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
4.66%
6M
4.43%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMAX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.14%
YTD
2.98%
6M
2.87%
1Y
8.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBNV vs. SMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PBNV
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November
4.66%9.61%2.82%
SMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF
2.98%8.01%1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PBNV and SMAX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024

0.84

The correlation between PBNV and SMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBNV vs. SMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBNV
PBNV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PBNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBNV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PBNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBNV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SMAX
SMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBNV vs. SMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November (PBNV) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBNVSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.67

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

4.49

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.00

24.03

-10.03

PBNV vs. SMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBNV Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the SMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBNV and SMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBNV vs. SMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBNV drawdown since its inception was -8.37%, which is greater than SMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBNV and SMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBNVSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-3.90%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.06%

-1.91%

-2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-0.29%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-0.40%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.36%

+0.45%

Volatility

PBNV vs. SMAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November (PBNV) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) at 0.77%. This indicates that PBNV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBNVSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

0.77%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.51%

2.18%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.21%

2.72%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.96%

3.65%

+3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.96%

3.65%

+3.31%

PBNV vs. SMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PBNV and SMAX have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

PBNV vs. SMAX - Dividend Comparison

PBNV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


PositionTTM20252024
PBNV
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF
0.95%0.98%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBNV and SMAX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBNV has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to SMAX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBNV dropped -8.37% vs SMAX's -3.90%.

On 1-year performance, PBNV leads with 11.35% vs 8.56% for SMAX. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, SMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PBNV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBNV and SMAX have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

SMAX has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for PBNV.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares.

SMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBNV and SMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer