PBNV vs. PUSH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBNV (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November) and PUSH (PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBNV is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while PUSH is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PBNV returned 12.77% vs 3.85% for PUSH. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBNV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PUSH.

Performance

PBNV vs. PUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November (PBNV) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBNV achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly higher than PUSH's 1.32% return.

PBNV

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 5.20%
• 6M: 5.74%
• 1Y: 12.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PUSH

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 3.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBNV vs. PUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PBNV PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November	5.20%	9.61%	5.75%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	1.32%	4.16%	1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PBNV and PUSH is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024	0.05

Return for Risk

PBNV vs. PUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBNV

PBNV Risk / Return Rank: 79
PBNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
PBNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PBNV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PBNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
PBNV Martin Ratio Rank: 82

PUSH

PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 88
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBNV vs. PUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November (PBNV) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBNV	PUSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.54	0.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	3.84	-0.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.71	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	7.72	-4.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.05	19.17	-3.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBNV vs. PUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBNV Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the PUSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBNV and PUSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBNV	PUSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	2.54	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.60	2.91	-1.31

Drawdowns

PBNV vs. PUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBNV drawdown since its inception was -8.37%, which is greater than PUSH's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBNV and PUSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBNV	PUSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.37%	-0.85%	-7.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.06%	-0.50%	-3.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	0.00%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.68%	-0.11%	-0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.80%	0.20%	+0.60%

Volatility

PBNV vs. PUSH - Volatility Comparison

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November (PBNV) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) at 0.30%. This indicates that PBNV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBNV	PUSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.87%	0.30%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.26%	0.98%	+3.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.05%	1.52%	+3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.96%	1.30%	+5.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.96%	1.30%	+5.66%

PBNV vs. PUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBNV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PUSH's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBNV vs. PUSH - Dividend Comparison

PBNV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PBNV PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PUSH PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF	3.23%	3.45%	1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBNV and PUSH in my portfolio?

PBNV and PUSH have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBNV or PUSH?

PBNV has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to PUSH (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBNV dropped -8.37% vs PUSH's -0.85%.

Which ETF is better, PBNV or PUSH?

On 1-year performance, PBNV leads with 12.77% vs 3.85% for PUSH. On fees, PUSH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PUSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBNV or PUSH?

Over the 1-year period, PBNV has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 3.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBNV or PUSH?

PUSH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PBNV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBNV or PUSH?

PUSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 0.00% for PBNV.

What is the main difference between PBNV and PUSH?

PBNV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PUSH is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBNV and 0.15% for PUSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBNV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.