PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBNV vs. BILZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBNV vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November (PBNV) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBNV achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly higher than BILZ's 1.66% return.


PBNV

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
4.66%
6M
4.43%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BILZ

1D
0.01%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBNV vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PBNV and BILZ is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBNV vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBNV
PBNV Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PBNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBNV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PBNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBNV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BILZ
BILZ Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBNV vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November (PBNV) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBNVBILZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-115.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

47.37

-45.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

197.18

-194.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.00

1,895.58

-1,881.59

PBNV vs. BILZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBNV Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the BILZ Sharpe Ratio of 18.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBNV and BILZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBNV vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBNV drawdown since its inception was -8.37%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBNV and BILZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBNVBILZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-0.52%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.06%

-0.02%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

0.00%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-0.01%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.00%

+0.81%

Volatility

PBNV vs. BILZ - Volatility Comparison

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November (PBNV) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) at 0.07%. This indicates that PBNV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBNVBILZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

0.07%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.51%

0.14%

+4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.21%

0.21%

+5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.96%

0.52%

+6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.96%

0.52%

+6.44%

PBNV vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBNV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBNV vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison

PBNV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BILZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BILZ
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund
4.06%4.19%4.95%2.23%
PBNV
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - November
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBNV and BILZ have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBNV has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to BILZ (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBNV dropped -8.37% vs BILZ's -0.52%.

On 1-year performance, PBNV leads with 11.35% vs 3.88% for BILZ. On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BILZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PBNV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 3.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PBNV.

BILZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.06%, compared with 0.00% for PBNV.

PBNV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBNV and 0.14% for BILZ.

BILZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.68 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBNV and BILZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer