PBJA vs. FLJJ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PBJA (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January) and FLJJ (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PBJA returned 11.68% vs 12.30% for FLJJ. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PBJA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FLJJ.

Performance

PBJA vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBJA achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly lower than FLJJ's 6.54% return.

PBJA

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.91%
• 6M: 4.78%
• YTD: 5.62%
• 1Y: 11.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.87%

FLJJ

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 1.06%
• 6M: 5.56%
• YTD: 6.54%
• 1Y: 12.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	$53.15K	$38.45K	$42.17K
PBJA PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January	$129.91K	$110.91K	$134.39K

PBJA vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PBJA PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January	5.62%	10.33%	10.97%
FLJJ Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF	6.54%	11.35%	14.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PBJA and FLJJ is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	0.89

The correlation between PBJA and FLJJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PBJA vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBJA

PBJA Risk / Return Rank: 91
PBJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PBJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PBJA Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PBJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PBJA Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FLJJ

FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 91
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBJA vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBJA	FLJJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.63	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	3.90	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.52	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	3.20	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.44	16.62	+0.82

PBJA vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBJA Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the FLJJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBJA and FLJJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBJA vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBJA drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, which is greater than FLJJ's maximum drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJA and FLJJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBJA	FLJJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.50%	-6.91%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.58%	-3.86%	+0.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.54%	-0.75%	+0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	0.74%	-0.07%

Volatility

PBJA vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) have volatilities of 1.60% and 1.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBJA	FLJJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.60%	1.65%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.08%	3.95%	+0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.81%	4.71%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.31%	6.14%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.31%	6.14%	+0.17%

PBJA vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBJA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FLJJ's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBJA vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither PBJA nor FLJJ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBJA and FLJJ in my portfolio?

PBJA and FLJJ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBJA or FLJJ?

FLJJ has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to PBJA (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBJA dropped -8.50% vs FLJJ's -6.91%.

Which ETF is better, PBJA or FLJJ?

On 1-year performance, FLJJ leads with 12.30% vs 11.68% for PBJA. On fees, PBJA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBJA or FLJJ?

Over the 1-year period, FLJJ has performed better with a 12.30% return vs 11.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBJA or FLJJ?

PBJA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FLJJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBJA or FLJJ?

PBJA and FLJJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PBJA and FLJJ?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBJA and 0.74% for FLJJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.