PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBJ vs. NVDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBJ vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBJ achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than NVDY's 15.63% return.


PBJ

1D
-0.42%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
6.76%
6M
5.92%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
5.31%

NVDY

1D
-0.64%
1M
8.18%
YTD
15.63%
6M
19.60%
1Y
52.45%
3Y*
55.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBJ vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
6.76%-1.86%2.49%-2.14%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
15.63%27.38%114.23%42.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PBJ and NVDY is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023

0.02

The correlation between PBJ and NVDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.03 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBJ vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBJ
PBJ Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PBJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBJ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PBJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBJ Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBJ vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBJNVDYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.00

1.93

-1.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.09

2.52

-2.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.32

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

4.29

-4.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.02

10.62

-10.65

PBJ vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the NVDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBJ and NVDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBJNVDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

1.93

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.67

-1.21

Drawdowns

PBJ vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBJ drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, which is greater than NVDY's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBJ and NVDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBJNVDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.15%

-34.08%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-12.81%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-34.08%

+21.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.15%

-4.54%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-6.15%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

5.18%

+0.05%

Volatility

PBJ vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) is 3.77%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that PBJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBJNVDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

9.09%

-5.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.81%

20.58%

-11.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

27.28%

-14.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.75%

38.24%

-24.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.11%

38.24%

-23.13%

PBJ vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBJ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBJ vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

PBJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than NVDY's 60.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
60.00%83.10%83.65%22.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBJ
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF
1.58%1.83%1.11%1.81%1.82%0.90%1.12%1.21%1.41%0.70%1.56%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBJ and NVDY have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDY has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to PBJ (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBJ dropped -39.15% vs NVDY's -34.08%.

On 3-year performance, NVDY leads with 55.70% vs 2.92% for PBJ. On fees, PBJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, PBJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 55.70% return vs 2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDY.

NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 60.00%, compared with 1.58% for PBJ.

PBJ is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while NVDY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PBJ and 0.99% for NVDY.

NVDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBJ and NVDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer