PBHAX vs. PQCMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PBHAX (PGIM High Yield Fund) and PQCMX (PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund) are both mutual funds - PBHAX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by PGIM, while PQCMX is a Commodities fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 5 years, PBHAX returned 3.33%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for PQCMX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBHAX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for PQCMX.

Performance

PBHAX vs. PQCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBHAX achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than PQCMX's 31.70% return.

PBHAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.69%
• 6M: 2.17%
• 1Y: 7.37%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: 3.33%
• 10Y*: 5.22%

PQCMX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: -3.48%
• YTD: 31.70%
• 6M: 30.81%
• 1Y: 43.75%
• 3Y*: 17.24%
• 5Y*: 12.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBHAX vs. PQCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBHAX PGIM High Yield Fund	1.69%	8.79%	6.89%	10.75%	-12.51%	5.63%	4.87%	15.86%	-1.53%	7.31%
PQCMX PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund	31.70%	13.62%	5.09%	-8.67%	19.10%	27.81%	-1.13%	8.78%	-12.07%	2.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PBHAX and PQCMX is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.16

The correlation between PBHAX and PQCMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PBHAX vs. PQCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBHAX

PBHAX Risk / Return Rank: 72
PBHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
PBHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PBHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
PBHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PBHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

PQCMX

PQCMX Risk / Return Rank: 77
PQCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PQCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PQCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PQCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PQCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBHAX vs. PQCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PBHAX	PQCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.59	-0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	3.22	+0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.46	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	6.09	-3.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.43	15.82	-0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PBHAX vs. PQCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the PQCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBHAX and PQCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PBHAX	PQCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	2.59	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.73	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.35	0.55	+0.79

Drawdowns

PBHAX vs. PQCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBHAX drawdown since its inception was -28.80%, smaller than the maximum PQCMX drawdown of -33.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBHAX and PQCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBHAX	PQCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.80%	-33.00%	+4.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.48%	-7.29%	+4.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.06%	-12.19%	+8.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.22%	-26.78%	+10.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.09%	+4.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-11.82%	+8.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.49%	2.80%	-2.31%

Volatility

PBHAX vs. PQCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) is 1.16%, while PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that PBHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBHAX	PQCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	6.06%	-4.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.71%	15.15%	-12.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.56%	17.26%	-13.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.06%	17.08%	-12.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.49%	15.18%	-9.69%

PBHAX vs. PQCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBHAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PQCMX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBHAX vs. PQCMX - Dividend Comparison

PBHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than PQCMX's 6.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBHAX PGIM High Yield Fund	6.73%	6.71%	6.01%	5.73%	5.94%	5.88%	5.70%	5.96%	6.26%	5.98%	4.61%	6.64%
PQCMX PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund	6.14%	8.09%	4.14%	3.93%	31.36%	47.61%	0.00%	1.02%	3.02%	1.42%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBHAX and PQCMX in my portfolio?

PBHAX and PQCMX have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBHAX or PQCMX?

PQCMX has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to PBHAX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBHAX dropped -28.80% vs PQCMX's -33.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.