PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBHAX vs. FTHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBHAX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBHAX achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than FTHRX's 0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PBHAX has outperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 5.18%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.00% annualized return.


PBHAX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.48%
6M
2.37%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
7.95%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
5.18%

FTHRX

1D
0.29%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.60%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
2.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBHAX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBHAX
PGIM High Yield Fund
1.48%8.79%6.89%10.75%-12.51%5.63%4.87%15.86%-1.53%7.50%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
0.15%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PBHAX and FTHRX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1990

0.17

Over the past year, PBHAX and FTHRX have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBHAX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBHAX
PBHAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PBHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PBHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBHAX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBHAXFTHRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.26

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

1.88

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.97

5.37

+8.60

PBHAX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBHAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBHAX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBHAX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBHAX drawdown since its inception was -28.80%, which is greater than FTHRX's maximum drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBHAX and FTHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBHAXFTHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.80%

-19.01%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.48%

-2.11%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.06%

-2.68%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.22%

-13.18%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.14%

-13.25%

-7.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-1.09%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-3.07%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.73%

-0.23%

Volatility

PBHAX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.91%. This indicates that PBHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBHAXFTHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

0.91%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

2.05%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61%

2.79%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.07%

4.03%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.49%

3.40%

+2.09%

PBHAX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBHAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBHAX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

PBHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, more than FTHRX's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.69%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%
PBHAX
PGIM High Yield Fund
6.74%6.71%6.01%5.73%5.94%5.88%5.70%5.96%6.26%5.98%4.61%6.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBHAX and FTHRX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBHAX has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to FTHRX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBHAX dropped -28.80% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

PBHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBHAX and FTHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer