PBH vs. MWA
PBH (Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc.) and MWA (Mueller Water Products, Inc.) are both stocks. PBH operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare), while MWA operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PBH returned -1.56%/yr vs 10.36%/yr for MWA. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PBH vs. MWA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBH achieves a -25.71% return, which is significantly lower than MWA's 5.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PBH has underperformed MWA with an annualized return of -1.56%, while MWA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.36% annualized return.
PBH
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -16.81%
- YTD
- -25.71%
- 6M
- -23.22%
- 1Y
- -46.39%
- 3Y*
- -7.81%
- 5Y*
- -1.87%
- 10Y*
- -1.56%
MWA
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- 5.82%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 21.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.36%
PBH vs. MWA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBH Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. | -25.71% | -21.00% | 27.56% | -2.20% | 3.22% | 73.93% | -13.90% | 31.15% | -30.47% | -14.76% |
MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc. | 5.82% | 7.01% | 58.45% | 36.27% | -23.81% | 18.06% | 5.45% | 34.32% | -26.09% | -4.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBH and MWA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2006 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
PBH:
$2.19B
MWA:
$3.95B
PBH:
$3.91
MWA:
$1.32
PBH:
11.73
MWA:
19.03
PBH:
2.21
MWA:
0.61
PBH:
2.05
MWA:
2.70
PBH:
1.16
MWA:
3.69
PBH:
$1.09B
MWA:
$1.46B
PBH:
$595.58M
MWA:
$550.00M
PBH:
$328.19M
MWA:
$311.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBH vs. MWA — Risk / Return Rank
PBH
MWA
PBH vs. MWA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. (PBH) and Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBH | MWA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | 0.17 | -1.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | 0.42 | -2.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.69 | 1.05 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 0.18 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | 0.42 | -2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBH | MWA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.60 | 0.17 | -1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.44 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.32 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.07 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
PBH vs. MWA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBH drawdown since its inception was -80.60%, smaller than the maximum MWA drawdown of -91.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBH and MWA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBH | MWA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.60% | -91.80% | +11.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.10% | -18.55% | -28.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.56% | -25.85% | -22.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.56% | -41.27% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.75% | -46.67% | -7.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.56% | -17.20% | -31.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.00% | -40.39% | +12.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.28% | 7.89% | +19.39% |
Volatility
PBH vs. MWA - Volatility Comparison
Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. (PBH) has a higher volatility of 14.47% compared to Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) at 6.71%. This indicates that PBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBH | MWA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.47% | 6.71% | +7.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.11% | 17.65% | +6.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.04% | 26.21% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 30.62% | -4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.39% | 32.24% | -2.85% |
Dividends
PBH vs. MWA - Dividend Comparison
PBH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWA Mueller Water Products, Inc. | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.15% | 1.72% | 2.18% | 1.55% | 1.72% | 1.71% | 2.20% | 1.28% | 0.83% | 0.91% |
PBH Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PBH vs. MWA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. and Mueller Water Products, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PBH vs. MWA - Profitability Comparison
PBH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. reported a gross profit of 148.99M and revenue of 281.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.9%.
MWA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a gross profit of 144.50M and revenue of 384.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.
PBH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. reported an operating income of 75.49M and revenue of 281.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.
MWA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported an operating income of 77.10M and revenue of 384.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
PBH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Prestige Consumer Healthcare Inc. reported a net income of 53.93M and revenue of 281.62M, resulting in a net margin of 19.2%.
MWA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Water Products, Inc. reported a net income of 59.10M and revenue of 384.40M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PBH and MWA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBH has higher volatility (14.47%) compared to MWA (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBH dropped -80.60% vs MWA's -91.80%.
MWA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBH and MWA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer