PBH.TO vs. L.TO
PBH.TO (Premium Brands Holdings Corporation) and L.TO (Loblaw Companies Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — PBH.TO in Packaged Foods, L.TO in Grocery Stores. Over the past 10 years, PBH.TO returned 8.12%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for L.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PBH.TO vs. L.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBH.TO achieves a -12.60% return, which is significantly lower than L.TO's 2.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PBH.TO has underperformed L.TO with an annualized return of 8.12%, while L.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.49% annualized return.
PBH.TO
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 6.09%
- YTD
- -12.60%
- 6M
- -9.40%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- -1.24%
- 5Y*
- -3.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
L.TO
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 13.39%
- 3Y*
- 31.22%
- 5Y*
- 29.84%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
PBH.TO vs. L.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBH.TO Premium Brands Holdings Corporation | -12.60% | 33.76% | -12.60% | 17.98% | -32.90% | 28.07% | 13.71% | 24.48% | -25.97% | 52.30% |
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 2.15% | 32.54% | 50.14% | 9.65% | 18.16% | 70.07% | -3.01% | 13.23% | 14.59% | -2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBH.TO and L.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 1997 | 0.12 |
The correlation between PBH.TO and L.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PBH.TO:
CA$4.55B
L.TO:
CA$74.51B
PBH.TO:
CA$0.88
L.TO:
CA$3.72
PBH.TO:
100.46
L.TO:
17.01
PBH.TO:
0.52
L.TO:
0.73
PBH.TO:
1.97
L.TO:
6.83
PBH.TO:
CA$7.85B
L.TO:
CA$64.25B
PBH.TO:
CA$1.33B
L.TO:
CA$19.91B
PBH.TO:
CA$571.30M
L.TO:
CA$7.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBH.TO vs. L.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PBH.TO
L.TO
PBH.TO vs. L.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Premium Brands Holdings Corporation (PBH.TO) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBH.TO | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.13 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 0.92 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 2.20 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBH.TO | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 0.65 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 1.60 | -1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.99 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.68 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
PBH.TO vs. L.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBH.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, which is greater than L.TO's maximum drawdown of -63.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBH.TO and L.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBH.TO | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.00% | -63.24% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.41% | -14.53% | -8.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.87% | -14.53% | -16.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.41% | -14.53% | -26.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.44% | -20.23% | -25.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.72% | -8.48% | -16.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.69% | -14.85% | -10.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.13% | 6.10% | +3.03% |
Volatility
PBH.TO vs. L.TO - Volatility Comparison
Premium Brands Holdings Corporation (PBH.TO) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) have volatilities of 7.96% and 7.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBH.TO | L.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 7.94% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.75% | 15.57% | +3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.98% | 20.68% | +4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 18.78% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 18.74% | +5.34% |
Dividends
PBH.TO vs. L.TO - Dividend Comparison
PBH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than L.TO's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L.TO Loblaw Companies Limited | 0.89% | 0.89% | 1.58% | 2.14% | 2.16% | 2.32% | 3.63% | 3.34% | 2.51% | 1.57% | 1.46% | 1.52% |
PBH.TO Premium Brands Holdings Corporation | 3.87% | 3.34% | 4.30% | 3.28% | 3.40% | 2.01% | 2.30% | 2.31% | 2.54% | 1.63% | 2.20% | 3.61% |
Financials
PBH.TO vs. L.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Premium Brands Holdings Corporation and Loblaw Companies Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PBH.TO vs. L.TO - Profitability Comparison
PBH.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation reported a gross profit of 322.20M and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.7%.
L.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a gross profit of 4.54B and revenue of 14.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
PBH.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation reported an operating income of 91.60M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
L.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported an operating income of 1.01B and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
PBH.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation reported a net income of 2.90M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
L.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loblaw Companies Limited reported a net income of 594.00M and revenue of 14.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PBH.TO and L.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PBH.TO and L.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer