PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBFR vs. OCTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBFR vs. OCTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBFR achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than OCTB's 6.18% return.


PBFR

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.58%
YTD
4.52%
6M
5.34%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTB

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.41%
YTD
6.18%
6M
6.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBFR vs. OCTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PBFR
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF
4.52%2.34%
OCTB
Aptus October Buffer ETF
6.18%2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PBFR and OCTB is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBFR vs. OCTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBFR
PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBFR vs. OCTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBFROCTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.09

PBFR vs. OCTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBFROCTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

1.97

-0.43

Drawdowns

PBFR vs. OCTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBFR drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, which is greater than OCTB's maximum drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFR and OCTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBFROCTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-4.79%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.17%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.63%

-0.70%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

Volatility

PBFR vs. OCTB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBFROCTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.33%

7.20%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.89%

7.20%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.89%

7.20%

-0.31%

PBFR vs. OCTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBFR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBFR vs. OCTB - Dividend Comparison

PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while OCTB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
OCTB
Aptus October Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBFR
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBFR and OCTB have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PBFR.

PBFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for OCTB.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PBFR and 0.25% for OCTB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBFR and OCTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer