PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBFR vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PBFR vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PBFR vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PBFR
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF
-0.75%10.44%5.53%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
-4.38%17.85%9.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBFR achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's -4.38% return.


PBFR

1D
1.19%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
1.42%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVV

1D
2.88%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
-4.38%
6M
-1.80%
1Y
17.69%
3Y*
18.29%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PBFR vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBFR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PBFR vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBFR
PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBFR vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBFRIVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

0.97

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

1.49

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.53

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.86

7.32

+3.53

PBFR vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBFR and IVV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBFRIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

0.97

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

0.42

+0.77

Correlation

The correlation between PBFR and IVV is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PBFR vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than IVV's 1.23% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBFR
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.23%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Drawdowns

PBFR vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBFR drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBFR and IVV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PBFRIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-55.25%

+46.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-12.06%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-6.26%

+4.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-10.85%

+10.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

2.53%

-1.49%

Volatility

PBFR vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) is 2.42%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that PBFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PBFRIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

5.30%

-2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.46%

9.45%

-5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

18.31%

-10.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

16.89%

-9.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.13%

18.04%

-10.91%