PBEU vs. RSPF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PBEU (Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF) and RSPF (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - PBEU tracks the BITA European Banks Index while RSPF tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PBEU charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPF.

Performance

PBEU vs. RSPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF (PBEU) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBEU achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than RSPF's -0.50% return.

PBEU

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: 7.22%
• YTD: 13.63%
• 6M: 14.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSPF

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: -0.50%
• 6M: -1.82%
• 1Y: 6.44%
• 3Y*: 18.00%
• 5Y*: 7.35%
• 10Y*: 12.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBEU vs. RSPF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF	13.63%	11.42%
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	-0.50%	5.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PBEU and RSPF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

PBEU vs. RSPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBEU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RSPF

RSPF Risk / Return Rank: 14
RSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
RSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
RSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 14
RSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
RSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBEU vs. RSPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF (PBEU) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBEU	RSPF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.69	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.08	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.46	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.26	—

Drawdowns

PBEU vs. RSPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBEU drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum RSPF drawdown of -81.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBEU and RSPF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBEU	RSPF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.26%	-81.32%	+64.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-3.38%	+1.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.94%	-19.00%	+15.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PBEU	RSPF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.63%	15.14%	+12.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.63%	19.77%	+7.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.63%	22.87%	+4.76%

PBEU vs. RSPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBEU has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPF's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBEU vs. RSPF - Dividend Comparison

PBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than RSPF's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBEU Portfolio Building Block European Banks Index ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	1.62%	1.55%	1.65%	2.16%	1.95%	1.56%	2.24%	1.85%	2.51%	1.28%	37.55%	2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBEU and RSPF in my portfolio?

PBEU and RSPF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PBEU or RSPF?

On fees, PBEU is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBEU or RSPF?

PBEU is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBEU or RSPF?

RSPF has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.01% for PBEU.

What is the main difference between PBEU and RSPF?

PBEU tracks BITA European Banks Index, while RSPF tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Financials -SEC. They also come from different issuers: Portfolio Building Block and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for PBEU and 0.40% for RSPF.