PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBDIX vs. FBNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBDIX vs. FBNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBDIX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than FBNDX's 0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PBDIX has underperformed FBNDX with an annualized return of 1.86%, while FBNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.09% annualized return.


PBDIX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.05%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
0.62%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
1.86%

FBNDX

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.06%
6M
0.15%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
2.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBDIX vs. FBNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBDIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund
-0.01%8.71%2.66%6.02%-14.24%-1.45%8.17%8.69%-0.01%3.83%
FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
0.06%7.37%0.93%6.51%-14.04%-1.13%9.79%9.82%-0.35%3.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PBDIX and FBNDX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2000

0.92

The correlation between PBDIX and FBNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBDIX vs. FBNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBDIX
PBDIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PBDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FBNDX
FBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBDIX vs. FBNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBDIXFBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.21

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

1.61

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.43

4.79

+1.64

PBDIX vs. FBNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the FBNDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBDIX and FBNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBDIXFBNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.18

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.01

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.42

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.53

+0.32

Drawdowns

PBDIX vs. FBNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBDIX drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, smaller than the maximum FBNDX drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDIX and FBNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDIXFBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.20%

-42.76%

+23.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-3.02%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.19%

-6.09%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.10%

-18.74%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.20%

-18.74%

-0.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-1.89%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-10.34%

+7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.01%

+0.03%

Volatility

PBDIX vs. FBNDX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX) has a higher volatility of 1.44% compared to Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) at 1.36%. This indicates that PBDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBDIXFBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

1.36%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

2.91%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

4.12%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

6.03%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

5.02%

-0.03%

PBDIX vs. FBNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBDIX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FBNDX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBDIX vs. FBNDX - Dividend Comparison

PBDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than FBNDX's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
3.92%3.87%3.34%3.56%1.98%1.34%4.70%2.75%2.86%2.18%2.72%2.66%
PBDIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund
5.70%5.59%5.17%4.00%2.01%1.84%3.59%3.18%2.94%2.75%2.82%2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBDIX and FBNDX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBDIX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to FBNDX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBDIX dropped -19.20% vs FBNDX's -42.76%.

PBDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBDIX and FBNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer