PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBDIX vs. RPIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBDIX vs. RPIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBDIX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than RPIFX's 1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PBDIX has underperformed RPIFX with an annualized return of 1.92%, while RPIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.83% annualized return.


PBDIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.56%
6M
1.19%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
1.92%

RPIFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.48%
6M
2.31%
1Y
5.84%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
4.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBDIX vs. RPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBDIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund
0.56%8.71%2.66%6.02%-14.24%-1.45%8.17%8.69%-0.01%3.83%
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
1.48%6.71%8.47%10.13%-1.96%4.67%2.42%8.82%0.39%3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PBDIX and RPIFX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2008

0.09

The correlation between PBDIX and RPIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBDIX vs. RPIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBDIX
PBDIX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PBDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

RPIFX
RPIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RPIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
RPIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBDIX vs. RPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBDIXRPIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

2.48

-0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

6.01

-3.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.97

-0.67

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

4.59

-2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.52

17.04

-9.53

PBDIX vs. RPIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the RPIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBDIX and RPIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBDIXRPIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.48

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

1.94

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

1.28

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.30

-0.45

Drawdowns

PBDIX vs. RPIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBDIX drawdown since its inception was -19.20%, smaller than the maximum RPIFX drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDIX and RPIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDIXRPIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.20%

-25.10%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-1.44%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.19%

-2.28%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.10%

-5.90%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.20%

-19.67%

+0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

0.00%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.45%

-1.34%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

0.39%

+0.63%

Volatility

PBDIX vs. RPIFX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX) has a higher volatility of 1.56% compared to T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund (RPIFX) at 0.56%. This indicates that PBDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBDIXRPIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

0.56%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

1.80%

+1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26%

2.37%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

2.75%

+3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

3.80%

+1.20%

PBDIX vs. RPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBDIX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than RPIFX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBDIX vs. RPIFX - Dividend Comparison

PBDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, less than RPIFX's 6.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBDIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund
6.04%5.59%5.17%4.00%2.01%1.84%3.59%3.18%2.94%2.75%2.82%2.99%
RPIFX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Floating Rate Fund
6.99%7.22%7.77%6.53%4.12%3.94%4.29%5.12%5.16%4.32%4.31%4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBDIX and RPIFX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBDIX has higher volatility (1.56%) compared to RPIFX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBDIX dropped -19.20% vs RPIFX's -25.10%.

RPIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBDIX and RPIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer