PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBDCX vs. PIMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBDCX vs. PIMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBDCX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than PIMIX's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PBDCX has underperformed PIMIX with an annualized return of 1.72%, while PIMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.71% annualized return.


PBDCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.03%
6M
-0.19%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
4.45%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*
1.72%

PIMIX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.91%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.41%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
4.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBDCX vs. PIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
0.03%7.27%2.10%6.82%-17.38%-2.01%6.29%13.44%-3.12%6.73%
PIMIX
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class
1.00%11.08%5.45%9.36%-9.07%2.62%5.84%8.10%0.63%8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PBDCX and PIMIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2007

0.71

Over the past year, PBDCX and PIMIX have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.71, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBDCX vs. PIMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBDCX
PBDCX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PBDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PIMIX
PIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBDCX vs. PIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBDCXPIMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

2.04

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

3.07

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.40

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.29

-0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.27

7.97

-3.70

PBDCX vs. PIMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBDCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the PIMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBDCX and PIMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBDCXPIMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

2.04

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.73

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

1.11

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.57

-0.83

Drawdowns

PBDCX vs. PIMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBDCX drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, which is greater than PIMIX's maximum drawdown of -13.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDCX and PIMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDCXPIMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-13.39%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.98%

-3.69%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.87%

-3.84%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.70%

-13.34%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.73%

-13.39%

-10.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.25%

-0.93%

-4.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-1.69%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

1.06%

+0.20%

Volatility

PBDCX vs. PIMIX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) have volatilities of 1.64% and 1.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBDCXPIMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

1.68%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.57%

3.29%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63%

4.15%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

4.84%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.74%

4.25%

+1.49%

PBDCX vs. PIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBDCX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PIMIX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBDCX vs. PIMIX - Dividend Comparison

PBDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than PIMIX's 5.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
3.70%3.55%3.21%2.45%2.46%3.48%2.69%2.82%3.04%3.33%2.76%5.47%
PIMIX
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class
5.83%6.01%6.27%6.21%4.98%4.02%4.88%5.83%5.66%5.37%5.52%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PBDCX and PIMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PIMIX has higher volatility (1.68%) compared to PBDCX (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBDCX dropped -23.73% vs PIMIX's -13.39%.

PIMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBDCX and PIMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer