PBDCX vs. PFORX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX).
PBDCX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Sep 3, 2004. PFORX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
PBDCX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PBDCX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBDCX PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C | -1.80% | 7.27% | 2.10% | 6.82% | -17.38% | -2.01% | 6.29% | 13.44% | -3.12% | 6.73% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | -2.23% | 4.33% | 5.70% | 9.52% | -10.33% | -1.67% | 6.17% | 7.64% | 2.64% | 3.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PBDCX achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly higher than PFORX's -2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PBDCX has underperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 1.75%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.77% annualized return.
PBDCX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -1.12%
- 1Y
- 2.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.54%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
PFORX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PBDCX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBDCX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PBDCX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank
PBDCX
PFORX
PBDCX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBDCX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 0.64 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 0.89 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.12 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 0.61 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 2.82 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBDCX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.64 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.31 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.90 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 1.25 | -0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between PBDCX and PFORX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PBDCX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison
PBDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than PFORX's 3.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBDCX PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C | 3.39% | 3.55% | 3.21% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 3.48% | 2.69% | 2.82% | 3.04% | 3.33% | 2.76% | 5.47% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 3.88% | 4.23% | 4.91% | 3.02% | 3.65% | 1.55% | 2.46% | 6.86% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 9.12% |
Drawdowns
PBDCX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBDCX drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDCX and PFORX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBDCX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.73% | -13.87% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.98% | -3.99% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.70% | -13.71% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.73% | -13.87% | -9.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | -3.69% | -3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -1.95% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 0.87% | +0.33% |
Volatility
PBDCX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) at 1.93%. This indicates that PBDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PBDCX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 1.93% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 2.53% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.08% | 3.38% | +1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 3.46% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 3.08% | +2.64% |