PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBDCX vs. PFORX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBDCX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBDCX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than PFORX's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PBDCX has underperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 1.72%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.90% annualized return.


PBDCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.03%
6M
-0.19%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
4.45%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*
1.72%

PFORX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.28%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.26%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
2.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBDCX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
0.03%7.27%2.10%6.82%-17.38%-2.01%6.29%13.44%-3.12%6.73%
PFORX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
0.12%4.33%5.70%9.52%-10.33%-1.67%6.17%7.64%2.64%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PBDCX and PFORX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2004

0.51

The correlation between PBDCX and PFORX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBDCX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBDCX
PBDCX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PBDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PFORX
PFORX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PFORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFORX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PFORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFORX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBDCX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBDCXPFORXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

0.76

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.27

2.32

+1.95

PBDCX vs. PFORX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBDCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the PFORX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBDCX and PFORX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBDCXPFORXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.80

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.44

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.92

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.26

-0.52

Drawdowns

PBDCX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBDCX drawdown since its inception was -23.73%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDCX and PFORX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDCXPFORXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.73%

-13.87%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.98%

-3.99%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.87%

-3.99%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.70%

-13.71%

-9.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.73%

-13.87%

-9.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.25%

-1.37%

-3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-1.95%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

1.30%

-0.04%

Volatility

PBDCX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C (PBDCX) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) at 1.47%. This indicates that PBDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBDCXPFORXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

1.47%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.57%

3.38%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63%

3.78%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

3.61%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.74%

3.16%

+2.58%

PBDCX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBDCX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBDCX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison

PBDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than PFORX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBDCX
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond Fund Class C
3.70%3.55%3.21%2.45%2.46%3.48%2.69%2.82%3.04%3.33%2.76%5.47%
PFORX
PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged)
4.10%4.23%4.91%3.02%3.65%1.55%2.46%6.86%2.90%1.46%1.38%9.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBDCX and PFORX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBDCX has higher volatility (1.64%) compared to PFORX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBDCX dropped -23.73% vs PFORX's -13.87%.

PBDCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBDCX and PFORX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer