PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBDC vs. FNCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PBDC vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PBDC vs. FNCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PBDC
Putnam BDC Income ETF
-9.87%-1.77%19.43%30.52%10.86%
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
-9.17%14.94%30.44%14.10%11.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBDC achieves a -9.87% return, which is significantly lower than FNCL's -9.17% return.


PBDC

1D
2.38%
1M
2.99%
YTD
-9.87%
6M
-8.48%
1Y
-12.07%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
10Y*

FNCL

1D
2.23%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
-9.17%
6M
-7.18%
1Y
2.69%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PBDC vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBDC has a 6.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PBDC vs. FNCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBDC
PBDC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCL
FNCL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FNCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCL Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBDC vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBDCFNCLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.56

0.14

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.66

0.32

-0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.05

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

0.26

-0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.29

0.79

-2.08

PBDC vs. FNCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBDC Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the FNCL Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBDC and FNCL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBDCFNCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

0.14

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.52

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between PBDC and FNCL is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PBDC vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison

PBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.69%, more than FNCL's 1.75% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBDC
Putnam BDC Income ETF
11.69%10.53%9.29%9.86%3.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNCL
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF
1.75%1.45%1.52%1.91%2.29%1.75%2.26%2.17%2.37%1.60%1.81%2.17%

Drawdowns

PBDC vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.47%, smaller than the maximum FNCL drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBDC and FNCL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PBDCFNCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.47%

-44.38%

+23.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.15%

-14.78%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.32%

-11.94%

-5.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-6.89%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.47%

4.92%

+4.55%

Volatility

PBDC vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison

Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) at 4.88%. This indicates that PBDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PBDCFNCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

4.88%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

11.75%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.62%

20.02%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

19.34%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.73%

22.35%

-5.62%