PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBCKX vs. PLSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBCKX vs. PLSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund (PLSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBCKX achieves a -5.15% return, which is significantly lower than PLSIX's 3.71% return. Over the past 10 years, PBCKX has outperformed PLSIX with an annualized return of 16.34%, while PLSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.23% annualized return.


PBCKX

1D
-2.20%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
-5.15%
6M
-5.85%
1Y
-1.17%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
16.34%

PLSIX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.67%
YTD
3.71%
6M
3.53%
1Y
10.10%
3Y*
9.44%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
5.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBCKX vs. PLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBCKX
Principal Blue Chip Fund
-5.15%9.20%26.90%40.58%-30.74%25.05%34.77%45.22%2.83%28.85%
PLSIX
Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund
3.71%10.46%8.16%10.93%-13.11%4.40%10.19%12.77%-3.15%8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PBCKX and PLSIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2012

0.79

The correlation between PBCKX and PLSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBCKX vs. PLSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBCKX
PBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

PLSIX
PLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
PLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBCKX vs. PLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund (PLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBCKXPLSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.36

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

2.47

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.05

10.93

-10.97

PBCKX vs. PLSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBCKX Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the PLSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBCKX and PLSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBCKX vs. PLSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBCKX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, smaller than the maximum PLSIX drawdown of -40.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBCKX and PLSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBCKXPLSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-40.52%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.10%

-4.30%

-14.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.10%

-5.92%

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

-17.93%

-20.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.00%

-17.93%

-20.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.75%

-0.41%

-8.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-6.65%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

0.97%

+5.48%

Volatility

PBCKX vs. PLSIX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund (PLSIX) at 2.28%. This indicates that PBCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBCKXPLSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

2.28%

+3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

4.74%

+8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

5.66%

+10.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.45%

6.90%

+13.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

5.92%

+14.34%

PBCKX vs. PLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBCKX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than PLSIX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBCKX vs. PLSIX - Dividend Comparison

PBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.03%, more than PLSIX's 5.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBCKX
Principal Blue Chip Fund
21.03%19.94%9.01%0.51%0.71%6.67%3.28%8.90%7.86%2.79%1.01%2.40%
PLSIX
Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Fund
5.58%5.79%6.17%2.59%5.27%7.76%3.80%5.45%7.67%4.76%2.50%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBCKX and PLSIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBCKX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to PLSIX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBCKX dropped -38.00% vs PLSIX's -40.52%.

PLSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBCKX and PLSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer