PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBCKX vs. GTLLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBCKX vs. GTLLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PBCKX having a 16.15% annualized return and GTLLX not far ahead at 16.32%.


PBCKX

1D
2.53%
1M
2.40%
6M
1.76%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
-0.60%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
16.15%
ALL TIME*
15.71%

GTLLX

1D
0.85%
1M
-0.06%
6M
19.60%
YTD
21.57%
1Y
33.91%
3Y*
22.75%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
16.32%
ALL TIME*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PBCKX vs. GTLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBCKX
Principal Blue Chip Fund
0.00%9.20%26.90%40.58%-30.74%25.05%34.77%45.22%2.83%28.85%
GTLLX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio
21.57%17.44%20.71%27.10%-21.69%32.91%18.80%34.86%-5.23%27.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PBCKX and GTLLX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2012

0.88

The correlation between PBCKX and GTLLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBCKX vs. GTLLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBCKX
PBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

GTLLX
GTLLX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GTLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBCKX vs. GTLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PBCKXGTLLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.29

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

3.02

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.42

11.21

-11.63

PBCKX vs. GTLLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBCKX Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the GTLLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBCKX and GTLLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PBCKX vs. GTLLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBCKX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, smaller than the maximum GTLLX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBCKX and GTLLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBCKXGTLLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-54.32%

+16.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.10%

-10.76%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.10%

-41.54%

+22.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

-41.54%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.00%

-41.54%

+3.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.80%

-2.83%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-8.54%

+2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.87%

2.89%

+3.98%

Volatility

PBCKX vs. GTLLX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) have volatilities of 5.29% and 5.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBCKXGTLLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

5.24%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.56%

15.43%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

18.85%

-2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.54%

29.22%

-8.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

25.10%

-4.86%

PBCKX vs. GTLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBCKX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than GTLLX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PBCKX vs. GTLLX - Dividend Comparison

PBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.94%, more than GTLLX's 12.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTLLX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio
12.61%15.33%40.42%4.91%7.93%20.20%15.12%14.10%16.97%2.29%0.58%0.61%
PBCKX
Principal Blue Chip Fund
19.94%19.94%9.01%0.51%0.71%6.67%3.28%8.90%7.86%2.79%1.01%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PBCKX and GTLLX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBCKX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to GTLLX (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBCKX dropped -38.00% vs GTLLX's -54.32%.

GTLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBCKX and GTLLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer