PBCKX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PBCKX (Principal Blue Chip Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PBCKX returned 6.94%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for FSPGX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PBCKX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

PBCKX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PBCKX

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: 2.40%
• 6M: 1.76%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: -0.60%
• 3Y*: 15.87%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: 16.15%
• ALL TIME*: 15.71%

FSPGX

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -2.42%
• 6M: 1.53%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 1Y: 10.13%
• 3Y*: 19.35%
• 5Y*: 11.86%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PBCKX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	0.00%	9.20%	26.90%	40.58%	-30.74%	25.05%	34.77%	45.22%	2.83%	28.85%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.30%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PBCKX and FSPGX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.92

The correlation between PBCKX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PBCKX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBCKX

PBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 3
PBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
PBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
PBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
PBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 10
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBCKX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBCKX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	0.46	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.13	0.75	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.09	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	0.50	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	1.49	-1.91

PBCKX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBCKX Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBCKX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBCKX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBCKX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBCKX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBCKX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.00%	-32.66%	-5.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.10%	-16.17%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.10%	-23.32%	+4.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.00%	-32.66%	-5.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.80%	-7.99%	+4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.66%	-6.36%	+0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.87%	5.40%	+1.47%

Volatility

PBCKX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) is 5.29%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that PBCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBCKX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.29%	6.43%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.56%	14.04%	-0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.52%	17.51%	-0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.54%	21.80%	-1.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.24%	21.58%	-1.34%

PBCKX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBCKX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBCKX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

PBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.94%, more than FSPGX's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.39%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	19.94%	19.94%	9.01%	0.51%	0.71%	6.67%	3.28%	8.90%	7.86%	2.79%	1.01%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBCKX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

PBCKX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBCKX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to PBCKX (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBCKX dropped -38.00% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.