PAYC vs. ASML
PAYC (Paycom Software, Inc.) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — PAYC in Software - Application, ASML in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, PAYC returned 13.52%/yr vs 32.27%/yr for ASML. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PAYC vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAYC achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 53.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PAYC has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 13.52%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 32.27% annualized return.
PAYC
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 22.39%
- 6M
- 22.34%
- YTD
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- -28.52%
- 3Y*
- -23.20%
- 5Y*
- -15.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.99%
ASML
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -11.50%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- YTD
- 53.00%
- 1Y
- 136.03%
- 3Y*
- 33.26%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 32.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.24B | $3.55B | $3.45B | |
| $122.41M | $116.28M | $133.30M |
PAYC vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAYC Paycom Software, Inc. | 3.45% | -21.70% | -0.04% | -33.06% | -25.26% | -8.19% | 70.82% | 116.22% | 52.43% | 76.59% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 53.00% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -9.80% | 56.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAYC and ASML is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2014 | 0.36 |
The correlation between PAYC and ASML shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PAYC:
$8.95B
ASML:
$627.85B
PAYC:
$8.66
ASML:
€27.54
PAYC:
18.93
ASML:
51.36
PAYC:
0.71
ASML:
3.38
PAYC:
4.25
ASML:
15.47
PAYC:
10.34
ASML:
24.94
PAYC:
$2.09B
ASML:
€35.33B
PAYC:
$1.70B
ASML:
€18.63B
PAYC:
$803.80M
ASML:
€13.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAYC vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
PAYC
ASML
PAYC vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAYC | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.41 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 6.23 | -6.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 21.34 | -22.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAYC vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAYC drawdown since its inception was -78.99%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYC and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAYC | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.99% | -90.00% | +11.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.11% | -21.95% | -29.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.27% | -45.38% | -15.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.99% | -56.84% | -22.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.99% | -56.84% | -22.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.60% | -18.01% | -51.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.71% | -28.04% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.70% | 6.40% | +28.30% |
Volatility
PAYC vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) have volatilities of 15.15% and 14.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAYC | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.15% | 14.49% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.60% | 37.32% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.05% | 46.08% | -5.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.08% | 43.25% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.73% | 39.13% | +5.60% |
Dividends
PAYC vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
PAYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than ASML's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.56% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
PAYC Paycom Software, Inc. | 0.91% | 0.94% | 0.73% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PAYC vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paycom Software, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PAYC vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison
PAYC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported a gross profit of 484.60M and revenue of 571.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.7%.
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 5.04B and revenue of 9.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.
PAYC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported an operating income of 210.20M and revenue of 571.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.8%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.46B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.
PAYC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Paycom Software, Inc. reported a net income of 155.70M and revenue of 571.90M, resulting in a net margin of 27.2%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.92B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAYC and ASML have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAYC has higher volatility (15.15%) compared to ASML (14.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAYC dropped -78.99% vs ASML's -90.00%.
ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAYC and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer