PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAY vs. FLYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAY vs. FLYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Paymentus Holdings, Inc. (PAY) and Flywire Corporation (FLYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAY achieves a -10.64% return, which is significantly lower than FLYW's 24.44% return.


PAY

1D
-0.14%
1M
33.66%
6M
-6.89%
YTD
-10.64%
1Y
-0.60%
3Y*
41.71%
5Y*
-4.51%
10Y*

FLYW

1D
-2.22%
1M
19.78%
6M
20.52%
YTD
24.44%
1Y
58.17%
3Y*
-16.16%
5Y*
-12.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAY vs. FLYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAY
Paymentus Holdings, Inc.
-10.64%-3.31%82.82%123.10%-77.10%21.63%
FLYW
Flywire Corporation
24.44%-31.33%-10.93%-5.39%-35.71%11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PAY and FLYW is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.44

The correlation between PAY and FLYW shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAY:

$3.54B

FLYW:

$2.14B

EPS

PAY:

$0.57

FLYW:

$98.10

PE Ratio

PAY:

49.31

FLYW:

0.18

PEG Ratio

PAY:

0.60

FLYW:

0.00

PS Ratio

PAY:

2.85

FLYW:

0.01

PB Ratio

PAY:

6.26

FLYW:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAY:

$1.28B

FLYW:

$188.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAY:

$316.55M

FLYW:

$299.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

PAY:

$121.90M

FLYW:

$11.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAY vs. FLYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAY
PAY Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAY Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FLYW
FLYW Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FLYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYW Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYW Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAY vs. FLYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Paymentus Holdings, Inc. (PAY) and Flywire Corporation (FLYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAYFLYWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.23

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

1.84

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

4.79

-4.93

PAY vs. FLYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the FLYW Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAY and FLYW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAY vs. FLYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAY drawdown since its inception was -80.78%, roughly equal to the maximum FLYW drawdown of -84.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAY and FLYW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAYFLYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.78%

-84.40%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.09%

-28.16%

-19.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.27%

-75.98%

+26.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.00%

-84.40%

+4.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.14%

-67.35%

+38.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.62%

-56.24%

+14.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.03%

10.80%

+16.23%

Volatility

PAY vs. FLYW - Volatility Comparison

Paymentus Holdings, Inc. (PAY) has a higher volatility of 15.68% compared to Flywire Corporation (FLYW) at 13.37%. This indicates that PAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAYFLYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.68%

13.37%

+2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.88%

38.33%

-4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.13%

48.34%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.43%

57.20%

+5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.48%

57.19%

+5.29%

Dividends

PAY vs. FLYW - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAY nor FLYW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PAY vs. FLYW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Paymentus Holdings, Inc. and Flywire Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
358.44M
188.11B
(PAY) Total Revenue
(FLYW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PAY vs. FLYW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Paymentus Holdings, Inc. and Flywire Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
24.1%
0
Portfolio components
PAY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Paymentus Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 86.23M and revenue of 358.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.1%.

FLYW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Flywire Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 188.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PAY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Paymentus Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 26.55M and revenue of 358.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

FLYW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Flywire Corporation reported an operating income of 10.78B and revenue of 188.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.

PAY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Paymentus Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 20.88M and revenue of 358.44M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

FLYW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Flywire Corporation reported a net income of 12.52B and revenue of 188.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAY and FLYW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAY has higher volatility (15.68%) compared to FLYW (13.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAY dropped -80.78% vs FLYW's -84.40%.

FLYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAY and FLYW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer