PAXWX vs. FCNTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pax Sustainable Allocation Fund (PAXWX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).
PAXWX is managed by Pax World. It was launched on Aug 9, 1971. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.
Performance
PAXWX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAXWX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXWX Pax Sustainable Allocation Fund | -3.18% | 10.87% | 12.61% | 13.19% | -16.50% | 15.31% | 16.23% | 20.84% | -4.07% | 13.16% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -5.35% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 32.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAXWX achieves a -3.18% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's -5.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PAXWX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 7.71%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.03% annualized return.
PAXWX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- -3.18%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 9.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
FCNTX
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- YTD
- -5.35%
- 6M
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 16.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAXWX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAXWX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAXWX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
PAXWX
FCNTX
PAXWX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax Sustainable Allocation Fund (PAXWX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAXWX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.01 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 1.56 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.79 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | 6.87 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAXWX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.01 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.69 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.82 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.76 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAXWX and FCNTX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAXWX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
PAXWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.96%, more than FCNTX's 4.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXWX Pax Sustainable Allocation Fund | 9.96% | 9.64% | 8.33% | 3.37% | 6.24% | 4.85% | 2.80% | 9.31% | 2.90% | 10.90% | 3.02% | 8.36% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 4.93% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
PAXWX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAXWX drawdown since its inception was -40.11%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXWX and FCNTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAXWX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.11% | -49.19% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.35% | -11.30% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -32.59% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.64% | -32.59% | +10.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | -8.18% | +3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -8.18% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 2.95% | -1.21% |
Volatility
PAXWX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pax Sustainable Allocation Fund (PAXWX) is 3.65%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that PAXWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAXWX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 6.51% | -2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.92% | 11.12% | -5.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.57% | 19.95% | -9.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.75% | 19.19% | -8.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.70% | 19.64% | -8.94% |