PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAXWX vs. ESGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAXWX vs. ESGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pax Sustainable Allocation Fund (PAXWX) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXWX achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than ESGV's 10.74% return.


PAXWX

1D
0.22%
1M
3.27%
YTD
5.40%
6M
5.37%
1Y
14.64%
3Y*
12.21%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
8.45%

ESGV

1D
-0.88%
1M
6.08%
YTD
10.74%
6M
10.73%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.27%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXWX vs. ESGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PAXWX
Pax Sustainable Allocation Fund
5.40%10.87%12.61%13.19%-16.50%15.31%16.23%20.84%-8.58%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
10.74%16.48%24.69%30.79%-24.04%26.55%25.69%33.36%-14.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXWX and ESGV is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2018

0.95

The correlation between PAXWX and ESGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAXWX vs. ESGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXWX
PAXWX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PAXWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXWX vs. ESGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax Sustainable Allocation Fund (PAXWX) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAXWXESGVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.93

2.11

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

2.89

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.43

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.00

10.42

-0.41

PAXWX vs. ESGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the ESGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXWX and ESGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAXWXESGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.11

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.69

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.72

-0.13

Drawdowns

PAXWX vs. ESGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXWX drawdown since its inception was -40.11%, which is greater than ESGV's maximum drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXWX and ESGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXWXESGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.11%

-33.66%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.41%

-11.60%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-20.41%

+9.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

-28.81%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.88%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-6.43%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

2.70%

-1.20%

Volatility

PAXWX vs. ESGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pax Sustainable Allocation Fund (PAXWX) is 2.41%, while Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that PAXWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAXWXESGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

3.37%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.14%

10.18%

-4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.82%

13.35%

-5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.76%

18.35%

-7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.74%

20.58%

-9.84%

PAXWX vs. ESGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXWX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAXWX vs. ESGV - Dividend Comparison

PAXWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than ESGV's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.85%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAXWX
Pax Sustainable Allocation Fund
9.15%9.64%8.33%3.37%6.24%4.85%2.80%9.31%2.90%10.90%3.02%8.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PAXWX and ESGV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESGV has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to PAXWX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXWX dropped -40.11% vs ESGV's -33.66%.

ESGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAXWX and ESGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer