PAXJ.L vs. HMXD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PAXJ.L (Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF) and HMXD.L (HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, from Amundi and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PAXJ.L returned 19.16% vs 16.27% for HMXD.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAXJ.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HMXD.L.

Performance

PAXJ.L vs. HMXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PAXJ.L having a 8.70% return and HMXD.L slightly lower at 8.48%.

PAXJ.L

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: -0.50%
• YTD: 8.70%
• 6M: 12.99%
• 1Y: 19.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HMXD.L

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: 8.48%
• 6M: 10.08%
• 1Y: 16.27%
• 3Y*: 13.45%
• 5Y*: 4.91%
• 10Y*: 7.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAXJ.L vs. HMXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PAXJ.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF	8.70%	20.68%	6.36%
HMXD.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF	8.48%	20.24%	6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXJ.L and HMXD.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	0.43

Over the past year, PAXJ.L and HMXD.L have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

PAXJ.L vs. HMXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PAXJ.L	HMXD.L
Financial Services	46.1%	44.3%
Basic Materials	14.6%	15.6%
Industrials	8.5%	8.8%
Real Estate	7.8%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	6.0%
Healthcare	3.7%	3.6%
Utilities	3.6%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	2.9%
Energy	2.9%	3.3%
Communication Services	2.7%	2.7%
Technology	1.1%	1.0%

Return for Risk

PAXJ.L vs. HMXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXJ.L

PAXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
PAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PAXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PAXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
PAXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
PAXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 63

HMXD.L

HMXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 37
HMXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
HMXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
HMXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
HMXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
HMXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXJ.L vs. HMXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAXJ.L	HMXD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	1.21	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	1.92	+1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.22	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.98	1.96	+2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.17	6.00	+5.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAXJ.L vs. HMXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the HMXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXJ.L and HMXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAXJ.L	HMXD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	1.21	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.93	0.43	+1.50

Drawdowns

PAXJ.L vs. HMXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -17.04%, smaller than the maximum HMXD.L drawdown of -38.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXJ.L and HMXD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAXJ.L	HMXD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.04%	-38.10%	+21.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.61%	-8.59%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.73%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.31%	-3.35%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.57%	-7.91%	+5.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.76%	—

Volatility

PAXJ.L vs. HMXD.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF (PAXJ.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L) have volatilities of 4.50% and 4.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAXJ.L	HMXD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.50%	4.66%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.52%	10.99%	+0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.28%	13.98%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.08%	19.97%	+7.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.08%	22.23%	+4.85%

PAXJ.L vs. HMXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXJ.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HMXD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAXJ.L vs. HMXD.L - Dividend Comparison

PAXJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, which matches HMXD.L's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMXD.L HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF	3.05%	3.30%	3.86%	4.09%	4.06%	2.81%	2.85%	3.74%	4.15%	3.09%	3.62%	4.31%
PAXJ.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF	3.08%	3.34%	5.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAXJ.L and HMXD.L in my portfolio?

PAXJ.L and HMXD.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PAXJ.L or HMXD.L?

On fees, PAXJ.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAXJ.L or HMXD.L?

PAXJ.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HMXD.L.

What is the main difference between PAXJ.L and HMXD.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PAXJ.L and 0.40% for HMXD.L.